期刊文献+

儿童肝移植术后供体生活质量分析 被引量:6

Analysis of health-related quality-of-life in donors of pediatric liver transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查儿童活体肝移植术后供体的生活质量情况并探讨影响其生活质量的主要因素。方法采用简明健康调查问卷(SF-36),对2005年1月至2014年12月在四川大学华西医院和重庆医科大学附属儿童医院实施的86例儿童活体肝移植供体进行了生活质量调查。所有纳入供体为不带肝中静脉的左半肝或左外叶切除者,且无重大并发症,能够较好应用汉语沟通者。将调查结果与普通人群生活质量进行比较,并对可能影响生活质量的因素进行分析探讨。结果共发放符合调查要求的问卷80例,有效回收问卷71例(88.7%)。男24例,女47例,平均年龄(29.4±8.O)岁。胆道闭锁患儿供体35例,代谢性肝病患儿供体15例,原发性肝硬化患儿供体11例,肝肿瘤及其他疾病患儿供体1O例。移植供体主要为受体父母。总体上,肝移植供体术后生活质量水平在各维度与普通人群没有明显的差异(P〉0.05);胆道闭锁患儿供体在精神健康维度得分优于非胆道闭锁患儿供体(P=0.029);全自费医疗患儿供体在总体健康方面得分明显低于具有医疗保险患儿的供体(P=0.033);供体手术2年后在生理功能(P=0.038)及躯体疼痛(P=0.040)维度得分较术后2年内明显增高;应用主成分分析将生活质量8个维度综合为1个维度,结果提示术后时间是影响肝移植供体术后生活质量的首要因素(P=0.037)。结论儿童肝移植供体术后生活质量状况良好,术后时间、受体原发病和受体医疗形式是影响供体生活质量的主要因素。 Objective To explore the health-related quality-of-life of pediatric liver transplant donors and examine the principal influencing factors of quality-of-life. Methods A total of 86 consecutive pediatric liver transplant donors undergoing hepatectomy were recruited from West China Hospital of Sichuan University and Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University between January 2005 and December 20T4. Health-related quality-of-life was measured with the Chinese version of Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). All participants fulfilled the criteria of left hepatic resection without middle hepatic vein involvement or left lateral lobectomy, no severe medical complications and communicating influent Chinese. The survey results were compared with those of general population. And the influencing factors of quality-of-life were also explored. Results A total of 80 questionnaires were distributed in accordance with the selection criteria and 71 (88. 70//00) returned. There were 24 males and 47 females with an average age of 29. 4 + 8. 0 years. The recipients had biliary atresia (BA,n = 35),metabolic liver disease (n = 15), primary hepatocirrhosis (n = 11) and hepatic tumors (n = 10). Most donors were recipients" parents. In general, all dimensions of health- related quality-of-life in donors were favorable as compared with general population (P ~0. 05).Mental health scores in donors donated to BA were better than those to non-BA (P = 0. 029). General health scores were lower in donors without recipients" medical insurance than those with recipients" medical insurance (P = 0. 033). Regarding physical functioning (P = 0. 038) and bodily pain (P = 0. 040),donors ~ 2 years after surgery scored higher than those ~2 years. Based upon principal component analysis, 8 dimensions of SF-36 were integrated into one single dimension. The Results indicated that time since surgery was a principal influencing factor of donors" quality-of-life (P = 0. 037). Conclusions The outcomes of health-related quality-of-life are favorable for pediatric liver transplant donors. Time since surgery, recipient's primary disease and medical insurance may impact the donors" postoperative quality-of-life significantly.
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 2016年第5期356-360,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
基金 四川省卫生厅科研课题(130052)
关键词 生活质量 问卷调查 肝移植 活体供者 胆道闭锁 Quality of life Questionnaire Liver transplantation Living donor Biliary atresia
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1朱志军,孙丽莹,魏林,高伟,杨涛,曾志贵,曲伟,张梁,刘颖,何恩辉.肝移植治疗小儿胆道闭锁130例报道[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2014,35(4):259-264. 被引量:22
  • 2隋晓军,朱志军,孙丽莹,魏林,曲伟,刘颖,曾志贵,高伟,杨涛.Kasai手术对活体肝移植治疗儿童胆道闭锁的影响[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2014,35(5):353-357. 被引量:9
  • 3Ware JE,Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection [J]. Med Care, 1992,30 (6) : 473-483. DOI: 10. 1097/00005650- 199206000-00002.
  • 4Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide[M]. Boston: New England Medical Center Health Institute, 1993 : 1-12.
  • 5李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113. 被引量:2153
  • 6Walter M, Papachristou C, Pascher A, et al. Impaired psychosocial outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation:a qualitative case study[J]. Clin Transplant, 2006,20 (4).-410-415. 13OI: 10. llll/j. 1399-0012. 2006. 00464. x.
  • 7Trotter JF, Hill-Callahan MM, Gillespie BW, et al. Severe psychiatric problems in right hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 2007,83 ( 11 ) : 1506-1508. DOh 10. 1097/01. tp. 0000263343. 21714. 3b.
  • 8Kroencke S, Nashan B, Fischer L, et al. Donor quality of life up to two years after living donor liver transplantation., a prospective study[J]. Transplantation, 2014, 97 (5) : 582-589. 1301:10. 1097/01. TP. 0000438206. 04348. b2.
  • 9Kousoulas L, Emmanouilidis N, Klempnauer J, et al. Living-donor liver transplantation: impact on donor's health-related quality of life[J]. Transplant Proc, 2011,43 (10) : 3584-3587. IX)I: 10. 1016/j. transproceed. 2011.10. 038.
  • 10Jin SG, Xiang B, Yan LN, et al. Quality of life and psychological outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18 (2) : 182- 187. DOI: 10. 3748/wjg. v18. i2. 182.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Qiao Wang,Lu-Nan Yan,Ming-Man Zhang,Wen-Tao Wang,Ji-Chun Zhao,Cong-Lun Pu,Ying-Cun Li,Quan Kang.The pre-Kasai procedure in living donor liver transplantation for children with biliary atresia[J].Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International,2013,12(1):47-53. 被引量:6
  • 2Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 3Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 4Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 5Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 6顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 7Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 8Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 9Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 10Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.

共引文献2179

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部