期刊文献+

环境规制新要求下中国工业部门对外经济政策研究——来自外商投资和贸易开放的经验证据 被引量:5

Chinese Foreign Economy Policy in Industrial Sectors under New Requirements for Environmental Regulation: Empirical Experience from Foreign Investment and Trade Opening
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国提出计划2030年左右碳排放达到峰值,这成为中国量化减排的环境规制新要求,中国作为国际贸易和投资大国,对外经济发展与经济低碳转型关系密切。文章以中国工业部门20个细分行业为研究对象构建面板数据模型,实证分析外商投资和贸易开放对中国行业碳排放的影响,尝试推导SRIO模型计算出口净隐含碳强度划分外贸高低碳行业,并进行实证对比分析,结果发现中国工业部门整体和分类行业的贸易开放度提高有助于减少行业碳排放强度,行业整体和高碳行业的外商投资规模扩大会增加碳排放强度和总量,而低碳行业的外商投资规模扩大则有助于降低行业碳排放强度,且存在倒"U"型的"环境库兹涅兹曲线(EKC)"。文章从中国工业部门差异化环境规制政策、吸引高质量外商投资以及注重发挥研发和科技作用等方面提出政策建议。 China plans to peak in carbon dioxide emiss in 2030,which means new requirements for environmental regulation of China's quantitative emission reduction. As a big country in international trade and foreign investment,China's foreign economic development has close relationship with low-carbon transition development. This paper constructs a panel model and empirically analyzes the effect of foreign investment and trade openness on CO2 emission of 20 industries in Chinese industrial sector,and tries to deduce SRIO model and calculate net carbon intensity embodied in export commodities,which is regarded as standard to divide total industries( ALIN) into trade-high-carbon industries( THIN) and trade-low-carbon industries( TLIN). Trade openness helps to reduce carbon intensity of Chinese industrial sector,while foreign investment increases carbon intensity and the amount of ALIN and THIN,but reduces carbon intensity of TLIN. Chinese industrial sector should expand foreign trade openness and carry out differentiated environmental regulation policies.
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期125-133,136,共9页 World Economy Studies
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"中国在全球生产网络中的角色变迁与对外经济发展方式转变"(项目编号:14BJL053) 上海市哲学社会科学青年课题"基于成效评估的中国对外经济发展方式转变路径优化研究"(项目编号:2014EJB001)的阶段性研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Aeharyya, J. FDI, Growth and the Environment: Evidence from India on CO2 Emission during the last Two Decades. Journal of Economic Development, 2009, 34 ( 1 ) : 43-58.
  • 2Ajide, K. B. , Adeniyi, O. FDI and the Environment in Developing Economies: Evidence from Nigeria. Environmental Research Journal, 2010, 4(4) :291-297.
  • 3Elliott, R.J.R. , Shimamoto, K. Are ASEAN Countries Havens for Japanese Pollution - Intensive Industry? The World Economy, 2008, 31(2) : 236-254.
  • 4Esty, D. C. ,Dua, A. Sustaining the Asia Pacific Miracle: Environmental Protection and Economic Integration. Peterson Institute Press: All Books, 1997.
  • 5Jalil, A. , Feridun, M. The Impact of Growth, Energy and Financial Development on the Environment in China: A Cointegration Analysis. Energy Economics,2011, 33 (2) : 284-291.
  • 6Perkins, R. , Neumayer, E. Transnational Linkages and the Spillover of Environment-efficiency into Developing Countries. Global Environ- mental Change, 2009, 19 (3) : 375-383.
  • 7Ren, S. , Yuan, B. ,Ma, X. , et al. International Trade, FDI and Embodied CO2 Emissions: A Case Study of Chinas Industrial Seetom. China Economic Review, 2014, 28 : 123-134.
  • 8Ridzuan, A. R. ,Noor, A. H. M. ,Ahmad, E. M. FDI Impact on Carbon Dioxide Emission in ASEAN. 2nd Annual Summit on Business and Entrepreneurial Studies, 2012 : 471-484.
  • 9Shui, B. , Harriss, R. C. The Role of C02 Embodiment in US-China Trade. Energy Policy, 2009,34 (18) :4063-4068.
  • 10Talukdar, D. , Meisner, C. M. Does the Private Sector Help or Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Carbon Dioxide Pollution in Develo- ping Countries. World Development, 2001,29(5) : 827-840.

二级参考文献439

共引文献1786

同被引文献170

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部