期刊文献+

工程可行性研究的公众可接受性向度 被引量:2

The Dimension of Public Acceptability in Engineering Feasibility Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 工程可行性研究通常主要关注的是工程中的技术、经济和物质(包括资源能源)方面的可行性,而较少注意到公众对工程活动的可接受性。其结果不仅造成公众对某些工程活动的抵制和不合作,政府、企业和工程技术人员也因此失去了公信力,并且造成巨大的经济损失。因此,无论是从理论上还是从实践上来看,都有必要将公众的可接受性纳入工程可行性研究的范围。文章从社会技术系统论出发,以大连PX项目为例,对现行的工程可行性研究的向度进行了系统反思;在此基础上,进一步阐明可行性概念的特征,指出现有的工程可行性研究忽视了对工程中公众可接受性的考量;进而分析可接受性的内容以及工程可接受性中存在的多元价值冲突;文章提出,基于公众沟通基础的可接受性研究是工程可行性研究的重要组成部分和工程成功的保障。 Most engineering feasibility studies up to now focus on technological, economic, and material (including resources and energy) feasibilities, while overlooking the public acceptability of engineering, which not only leads to public resistance, but also results in the loss of credibility in government, enterprises and engineers and technicians. Some engineering projects also cause huge waste in natural and financial resources. In this sense, it is necessary to integrate acceptability studies into the concept of engineering feasibility studies. From the aspect of socio-technical system, taking Dalian PX Project as an example, this paper analyzes the deficiency of the current feasibility concept in theory and practice and reflects on the characteristics of feasibility, pointing out that current engineering feasibility studies ignore the dimension of public acceptability of engineering. And then, this paper reconsiders the contents of acceptability and multiple value conflicts in engineering acceptability. Finally, this paper suggests that the acceptability study, which is based on sound public communication, is the important element of engineering feasibility study and guarantee of engineering success.
作者 王国豫 李磊
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期92-98,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目:高科技伦理问题研究(项目编号:12&ZD117) 大连理工大学人文社科创新团队项目:负责任地创新-创造性与规范性(项目编号:DUT15RW602)
关键词 工程 可行性 可接受性 公众 Engineering Feasibility Acceptability Public
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献54

  • 1王国豫.德国技术哲学的伦理转向[J].哲学研究,2005(5):94-100. 被引量:31
  • 2C.胡比希,王国豫.技术伦理需要机制化[J].世界哲学,2005(4):78-82. 被引量:14
  • 3陈来.竹简《五行》章句简注——竹简《五行》分经解论[J].孔子研究,2007(3):12-15. 被引量:11
  • 4《国语》.上海古籍出版社,1982年版,第357页,第356页.
  • 5.《五行》[M].,..
  • 6[美] 查尔斯·E.哈里斯,等.工程伦理:概念和案例[M].丛杭青,等,译.北京:北京理工大学出版社,2006:13.
  • 7Merritt Roe Smith,Technological Determinism in American Culture,in Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx,eds.,Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technology Determinism.Cambridge,MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press,1994,p.2.
  • 8Langdon Winner.Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Empty:Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.Science,Technology,and Human Values,1993,vol.18,no.3,pp.362-378.
  • 9Deborah Johnson,Jameson Wetmore.Technology and Society:Building Our Sociotechnical Future.Cambridge,MA:Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press,2009:pp.94-95.
  • 10Deborah Johnson,Keith W.Miller.Computer Ethics:Analyzing Information Technology.Upper Saddle River,NJ:Prentice Hall,2009:pp.13-18.

共引文献1030

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部