期刊文献+

高管薪酬激励与费用粘性克服——基于“薪酬差距”和“薪酬溢价”视角的实证检验 被引量:10

Executive Compensation Incentives' Anti-Sticky Effect on Expense——An Empirical Test about Pay Gap and Salary Premium
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者从高管薪酬溢价和高管薪酬差距两个角度实证检验了高管薪酬激励的费用粘性克服特征,并从市场化程度、行业、股东性质等角度,进一步检验和分析了高管薪酬激励的费用粘性克服效果。研究发现我国上市公司的费用具有明显的粘性特征,高管薪酬激励能有效克服费用粘性;相比落后地区,发达地区上市公司中高管薪酬激励的粘性克服效果较差;两种高管激励方式的粘性克服效果存在行业差异;国有上市公司中,高管薪酬激励的粘性克服效果非常显著,非国有上市公司中则不显著。 In this study, the author tested the anti-sticky effect of compensation incentives (contain both pay gap and salary premium)empirically and studied the changes of compensation incentives' anti-sticky effect when market, industry and shareholder are different.Results show that the expense of List Companies in China is significantly "sticky" and compensation incentives are anti-sticky. Compa-ring to developed area, compensation incentives of the companies in undeveloped area are more effective in reducing stickiness. Com-pensation incentives of non-manufacturing companies reduce stickiness significantly but not in manufacturing companies. Compensationincentives of SOEs reduce stickiness significantly but not in non-SOEs.
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期96-101,共6页 Economic Survey
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13BJY015) 国家自然科学基金项目(71302132) 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2014GP004)
关键词 薪酬差距 薪酬溢价 费用粘性 企业性质 Pay Gap Salary Premium Expense Stickiness Nature of Business
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

二级参考文献229

共引文献1972

同被引文献132

引证文献10

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部