期刊文献+

合著者贡献率的国际文献回顾 被引量:5

Review of Contribution of International Co-author Literature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文对合著者贡献率的国际文献进行了回顾,分析了修正Harmonic算法,CCA分配法,夏普里值法,Ab-index以及NBA算法等作者贡献分配率算法的优缺点。结果表明:修正Harmonic算法在评价作者贡献时仅仅区分第一作者,年长作者和其它作者,评价算法相对简单。CCA分配法通过常数K,调整了合著者之间的贡献分配,CCA算法合著者贡献率取值在Fractional和Harmonic算法范围之间。夏普里值法通过界定具体的边际贡献细节确定某一作者在合著中的边际贡献,但计算过程复杂。Ab-index明确区分了第一作者,通讯作者和其它作者的贡献;提出了适合各年龄层次的作者区分度方法,易于操作。NBA算法贡献率分配指数随着学科不同而取不同的值。 This paper reviewed the hteratures of co - author contribution, mrd the 'advantages and disadvantages of Harmon- ic, CCA, Shapley, Ab- index and NBA methods. Findings showed that Harmonic methods only distinguished the first author, senior author and other authors. This method is relative simple. CCA relocated the contribution level through constant K. Shapley value solution originated from cooperative game theory, and divided benefits from cooperation written by a set of authors. Ab - in- dex clarified the contributions of the first author, corresponding author, and other co - authors and the sharing of credit in a logical ratio. NBA contribution varied across different disciplines.
作者 王红 王全红
出处 《现代情报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期63-70,共8页 Journal of Modern Information
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"基于SCI/ESI不同学科人才评价及实证分析"(项目编号:DUT15RW128)
关键词 合著者 贡献率 文献回顾 Harmonic算法 CCA分配法 夏普里值法 Ab-index co-authors contribution literature review Harmonic CCA Shapley Ab-index
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1I.K.Ravichandra Rao Professor & Head.Distributions of Multiple Authors:A Case Study of two Journals (JASIST and Scientometrics)[J].Collnet Journal of Scientometrics & Information Management,2008,2(1):27-36.
  • 2Waltman,L.et al..The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012:Data collec- tion,indicators,and interpretation[J].Journal of the American So- ciety for Infonnation Science and Technology,2012,63(12):2419-2432.
  • 3Huang M H,Lin C S,Chen D Z.Counting methods,country rank changes,and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity and impact[J].Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2011,62(12):2427-2436.
  • 4Egghe,L.,Rousseau,R.,& Van Hooydonk,G.Methods for ac- crediting publications to authors or countries:Consequences for evalua- tion studies[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Sci- ence,2000,51(2):145-157.
  • 5Abbas,A.M..Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship[J].Scientometrics,2011,88(1):107-131.
  • 6Hodge SE,Greenberg DA Publication credit[J].Science,1981,213:950.
  • 7Hagen,N.T..Harmonic publication and citation counting:sharing authorship credit equitably - not equally,geometrically or arithmetically[J].Scientometrics,2010,84(3):785-793.
  • 8Hagen N T.Counting and comparing publication output with and with- out equalizing and inflationary bias[J].Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(2):310-317.
  • 9Uu X Z,Fang H.Fairly sharing the credit of multi - authored papers and its application in the modification of h - index and g - index[J].Scientometrics,2012,91(1):37-49.
  • 10李纲.Shapley值在知识联盟利益分配中的应用[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):115-117. 被引量:16

二级参考文献14

共引文献15

同被引文献28

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部