期刊文献+

标准去大骨瓣治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效及安全性分析 被引量:12

Standard large craniectomy in the treatment of craniocerebral trauma:the clinical efficacy and safety analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨标准去大骨瓣治疗颅脑外伤的临床疗效及安全性分析。方法选取我院收治的60例颅脑外伤患者为研究对象,其中行标准去大骨瓣减压术患者30例(标准骨瓣组),行传统骨瓣减压术患者30例(传统骨瓣组),观察比较2组临床疗效及安全性。结果标准骨瓣组恢复良好率为53.33%,病死率为16.67%,传统骨瓣组恢复良好率为33.33%,病死率为36.68%,组间相比均具有显著差异(χ2=4.83,P<0.05;χ2=4.91,P<0.05)。标准骨瓣组并发症发生率为10.00%,传统骨瓣组术后并发症发生率为16.67%,组间相比差异显著(χ2=4.56,P<0.05)。结论标准去大骨瓣减压术治疗颅脑损伤的疗效明显优于传统骨瓣减压术,不良反应发生率较低,值得临床推广与应用。 Objective To explore the effect and safety of standard iarge craniectomy in the treatment of craniocerebral trauma. Methods Sixty cases with craniocerebral trauma treated in our hospital from August 2003 to August 2014 were select- ed, among whom 30 patients treated by standard large craniectomy were regarded as standard group and others receiving traditional skull flap decompression were considered as traditional group. Then the clinical curative effect and safety of the two groups were observed and compared. Results The good recovery rate was 53.33% and thc mortality rate was 16.67% in the standard group, which was 33.33% and 36.68~ in the traditional group, respectively, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant different (X2= 4.83, P〈0.05; X2= 4.91, P〈0.05). The complication rate of 10.00% in standard group was significantly lower than 16.67% in traditional group (x2= 4.56, P〈0.05). Conclusion Standard large cranioectomy with less adverse events can exert a better curative effect than the traditional skull flap decompression, which is worth to be popularized and applied widely.
出处 《中国实用神经疾病杂志》 2016年第8期13-14,共2页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
关键词 标准去大骨瓣减压术 颅脑外伤 术后并发症 Standarded eranioeetomy Craniocerebral injury Postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献62

  • 1王喜国,宋保新,金大战,王建星,欧洋.去大骨瓣减压术后并发症的临床分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(6):463-463. 被引量:53
  • 2廖勇仕,梁日初,蒋斌,石巧玲,黄性敏.标准大骨瓣在重型颅脑损伤中的临床应用[J].中国临床神经外科杂志,2005,10(6):461-462. 被引量:16
  • 3张军,程亭秀.影响重型颅脑损伤预后的因素[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2006,1(4):240-241. 被引量:10
  • 4江基尧.介绍一种美国临床常用的标准外伤大骨瓣开颅术[J].中华神经外科杂志,1998,14:381-381.
  • 5Salvatore C, Marco M, Antonio R, et al. Combined internal uneusectomy and decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of severe closed head injury: experience with 80 cases. J Neurosurg, 2008, 108 (1) :74 -79.
  • 6Morgalla MH, Will BE, Roser F, et al. Do long - term results justify decompressire craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg, 2008, 109 (4) :685 -690.
  • 7Jiang JY, Xu Wei, Li WP, et al. Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hepertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma, 2005, 22 (6) :623 -628.
  • 8Polin RS, Shaffrey ME, Bogaev CA, et al. Decompressive bifrontal craniectomy in the treatment of severe refractory posttraumatie cerebral edema. Neurosurgery, 1997,41(1) :84 -94.
  • 9Stefini R, Bergomi R, Catenacci E, et al. Bioccipital decompressive craniectomy in refractory post traumatic intracranial hypertension: first report of one ease. Br J Neurosurg, 2007, 21 (5) : 527 - 531.
  • 10Yoo DS, Kim DS, Cho KS, et al. Ventricular pressure monitoring during bilateral decompression with dural expansion. J Neurosurg, 1999, 91 (6):953-959.

共引文献229

同被引文献69

引证文献12

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部