期刊文献+

学术语篇的评价性分析

Academic discourse analysis of the valuation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着功能语言学和社会建构主义的流行,关于学术语篇的研究更多关注语篇的社会属性,学术语篇的评价性也成为语篇分析的焦点。本文主要分析了Hyland的元话语人际模式以及Martin&White的评价资源如何被学术作者运用来与读者进行互动、协商及评价,进而引导读者与作者的人际网络的建立以及确立自身的学术身份确定。 With the popularity of functional linguistics and social constructivism, the study of academic discourse pay more attention to the social attribute of language, academic discourse of valuation has become the focus of discourse analysis. This article mainly analyzes the yuan Hyland discourse interpersonal model and Martin & White evaluation resources how to interact with readers by academic authors apply, consultation and evaluation, which guides the reader and the author of the establishment of the network and establish their own academic identified.
作者 谢丽
出处 《湖南城市学院学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2016年第4期238-240,共3页 Journal of Hunan City University:Natural Science
关键词 学术语篇 评价性 元话语 介入 级差 Academic discourse Valuation Yuan discourse Intervention differential
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Hyland, K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles [M] Amsterdam: Benjamin' s, 1998.
  • 2Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing [M] . London: Longman, 2000.
  • 3Hyland, K. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. [J|. Written Communication. 2001 (4):549-574.
  • 4Hyland Ken. Metadiscourse[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2008.
  • 5赵文超.元话语与主体间性的关系刍议[J].宁波大学学报(人文科学版),2015,28(1):40-45. 被引量:6
  • 6Hood,S&Martin,J.R.InvokingAttitude:ThePlayofGraduationinAppraisingDiscoflrse[A].马丁文集(2)浯篇语义研究,上海:上海交通大学出版社,2010..
  • 7张滟.学术话语中的级差范畴化及其修辞劝说构建[J].外国语,2008,31(6):33-40. 被引量:24

二级参考文献51

  • 1张滟.超越解构:话语行为的社会符号性动机分析[J].外语学刊,2006(2):20-24. 被引量:17
  • 2张德禄,刘世铸.形式与意义的范畴化——兼评《评价语言——英语的评价系统》[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(6):423-427. 被引量:55
  • 3Martin, J. R.and P. R. R. White. The Language of Evalvation: Appraisal in English[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
  • 4White, P. R. R. Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance[J].. Text, 2003,23(2) : 259 -84.
  • 5Hood, S. Appraising Research: Taking a Stance in Academic Writing[D].Sydney: U of Technology, Sydney, 20o4.
  • 6Hyland, K. Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1998, (30) : 437 -55.
  • 7Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change[M]. Cambridge: Polity P, 1992.
  • 8Bhatia, V. K. Worlds of Written Discourse[ M]. London: Continuum, 2004.
  • 9Miller, C. R. Genre as Social Action [ A ]. A. Freedman and P. Medway. Genre and the New Rhetoric[ C]. London and New York: Taylor & Francis, 1994.23 -42.
  • 10Hyland, K. Disciplinary Discouarse : Social Interactions in Academic Writing [ M ]. Edinburgh Gate, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2000.

共引文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部