期刊文献+

论英国法上的地役权时效取得——兼谈香港法地役权时效取得 被引量:1

The Prescription of Easement in English Law and in Hong Kong Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国法上的地役权时效取得制度,经由普通法、衡平法、制定法三方面的努力,已形成普通法与衡平法地役权时效取得互补,制定法完善普通法与衡平法的局面。我国香港地区的相关制度,原本与英国法一脉相承,回归之后,制定法丧失其合法存在的基础,但是普通法与衡平法中的时效取得规则,仍然适用于地役权的时效取得。 English institution of prescription of easement has formed a framework that the rules of prescription in common law complemented with equity law, and the correlation rules of statute perfected common law and equitylaw. Hong Kong law can be traced to the same origin of English law. After the return of Hong Kong, the statute of English concerned has lost its legitimacy, but the rules of prescription of easement from common law and equity laware still applicable.
作者 雷秋玉
出处 《嘉应学院学报》 2016年第3期49-54,共6页 Journal of Jiaying University
基金 昆明理工大学省级人才培养项目(KKSY201224008) 云南省教育厅科学研究基金重点项目(2014Z015)
关键词 地役权 时效取得 普通法规则 权利遗失规则 easement prescription common law the rule of deed lost
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1P JACKSON.The law of Easements and Profits[M].Butterworths,1978:137.
  • 2PAUL COUGHLAN.Property Law[M].Gill&Macmilian,1995.
  • 3GARY WATT.Case and Materials·Land Law[M].Blackstone Press Limited,1998.
  • 4ROBERT MEGARRY,CHARLES HARPUM,SIR WILLIAM WADE.The Law of Real Property[M].Sweet&Maxwell,2012.
  • 5李红海.“水和油”抑或“水与乳”:论英国普通法与制定法的关系[J].中外法学,2011,23(2):415-428. 被引量:7
  • 6Chung Yeung Hung&Ors v Law Man Nga&Anor[1997]2HKC 406,[1997]1 HKLRD 1022.
  • 7High Court,unreported,2 May 1984.See Paul Coughlan,Property Law,Gill&Macmilian,1995,p.252.
  • 8Statute of Westminster I,1275,c.39.
  • 9Angus&Co.v Dalton[1877]3 QBD 85,94.See Paul Coughlan,Property Law,Gill&Macmilian,1995,p.254.
  • 10Deeble v Linehan[1860]12 ICLR 1.See Paul Coughlan,Property Law,Gill&Macmilian,1995,p.255.

二级参考文献40

  • 1[美]爱德华·S·考文.《美国宪法的“高级法”背景》,生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996年版,第5页.
  • 2F. W. Maitland, Equity also the Forms of Action at Common Law, two courses of lectures by F. W. Maitland, ed. by A. H. Chaytor and W. J. Whittaker, Cambridge University Press, 1909, pp. 15 -17.
  • 3[美]M.A.艾森伯格.《普通法的本质》,张曙光,张小平,张含光等译,法律出版社2004年版,页1.
  • 4Jack Beatson, "Has the Common Law a Future?", Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 56, ( 1997 ), p. 295.
  • 5Jack Beatson, "The Role of Statute in the Development of Common Law Doctrine", Law Quarterly Review, Vol. l17, (2001), p. 248.
  • 6Trevor R. S. Allan, Law, Liberty, and Justice The Legal Foundations of British Constitutional- ism, Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 79,81.
  • 7《附条件赠与法》.
  • 8Roscoe Pound, "Common Law and Legislation , Harv. L. Rev., vol. 21, (1908), p. 383.
  • 9Jack Beatson, "Has the Common Law a Future?", Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 56, ( 1997 ), p. 300.
  • 10[英]保罗·布兰德.《英格兰律师职业阶层的起源》,李红海译,北京大学出版社2009年版,页55-70.

共引文献6

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部