期刊文献+

基于语用论辩学的批判性阅读模式研究 被引量:5

Construction of a New Critical Reading Model Based on the Theory of Pragma-Dialectics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判性阅读是培养批判性思维能力的重要途径之一,但现有的批判性阅读研究大多数都缺乏系统的理论依据,且提出的阅读步骤过于繁复,可操作性值得商榷。以语用论辩学中的批判性讨论理想模型为基础,提出一种新的、可操作性强的批判性阅读模式。该模式将批判性阅读活动简化为三大步骤——识别论证、分析与重构论证以及评价论证,并以China Daily上的一篇评论文章为例,演示说明了各个步骤的具体实施过程与操作方法。该模式有助于教师在课堂上对学生进行批判性阅读训练,同时也有助于学生在课外自主开展批判性阅读,从而达到提高学生的批判性阅读能力的目的。 There exists some research on how to do critical readings and teachings, but the reading steps mentioned in existing research are over-elaborated and the teaching strategies are too general for students to follow. This paper attempts to construct a new and operable critical reading model on the basis of the ideal model of critical discussion in the theory of pragma-dialectics. The proposed new model divides the whole critical reading activity into three parts: identifying arguments, analyzing and reconstructing arguments and evaluating arguments, with all of the specific implementations demonstrated in detail in the analysis and evaluation of a review article in China Daily on whether private sector influence should be prevented in healthcare industry. It is believed that the new critical reading model will be helpful both for teachers to organize critical reading activities in class and for students to conduct critical readings on their own after class.
作者 闫林琼 吴鹏
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2016年第1期90-97,共8页 Foreign Languages and Literature
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD720014) 国家社会科学基金青年项目(14CYY053) 中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2013M530245)的研究成果
关键词 批判性阅读 语用论辩学 批判性讨论理想模型 阅读模式 critical reading the theory of pragma-dialectics the ideal model of critical discussion reading model
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Albeckay,E.M.2014.Developing Reading Skills through Critical Reading Programme amongst Undergraduate EFLStudents in Libya[J].Social and Behavioral Science(123):175-181.
  • 2Haromi,F.A.2014.Teaching through Appraisal:Developing Critical Reading in Iranian EFL Learners[J].Social and Behavioral Sciences(98):127-136.
  • 3McI nerny,D.Q.2013.简单的逻辑学[M].赵明燕,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社.
  • 4Pizozzi,R.2003.Critical Reading,Critical Thinking[M].New York:Longman.
  • 5Renkema,J.2009.Introduction to Discourse Studies[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
  • 6Tabacˇková,Z.2015.Outside the Classroom Thinking Inside the Classroom Walls:Enhancing Students’Critical Thinking Through Reading Literary Texts[J].Social and Behavioral Sciences(186):726-731.
  • 7Van Eemeren,F.&R.Grootendorst.1992.Argumentation,Communication and Fallacies[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 8van Eemeren,F.,Grootendorst,R.&A.Henkemans,F.S.2002.Argumentation:Analysis,Evaluation,Presentation[M].New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • 9van Eemeren,F.&R.2004.Grootendorst.A Systematic Theory of Argumentation:The Pragma-dialectical Approach[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • 10高瑛,许莹.西方批判性思维研究:回顾与反思[J].外语学刊,2014(5):1-6. 被引量:32

二级参考文献186

同被引文献78

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部