期刊文献+

全要素生产率、产品质量和企业亏损——基于2015年中国企业-员工匹配调查的实证研究 被引量:5

Total Factor Productivity,Product Quality and Business Losses——Empirical Research Based on China Employer- Employee Survey in 2015
下载PDF
导出
摘要 全要素生产率提升企业经营绩效的作用机制是什么?本文利用"中国企业-员工匹配调查"(CEES)数据,得出2014年广东省制造业企业亏损面约为12.2%。亏损面较小的企业具有如下特征:企业年龄为11至15年、中型(员工人数为301至1 000人)、民营、具有出口行为、非加工贸易型企业、属于高新技术企业等。基于OLS和Probit计量回归,全要素生产率的提高能显著促进产品质量的提升,而产品质量的提升又对企业亏损有着显著的抑制效应。通过内生性检验,全要素生产率-产品质量-企业亏损具有显著的因果效应。全要素生产率通过促进产品质量的提高,显著降低了企业亏损,这为经济新常态下我国政府进一步加强供给侧改革,引导企业以提高全要素生产率和产品质量为核心进行资源重新配置,提供了一定的证据支持。 What is the influence mechanism of total factor productivity (TFP) to improve enterprise' s performance? This empirical research using CEES data shows that the loss coverage of the manufacturing enter- prises in Guangdong province in 2014 is about 12.2%. The enterprises with lower loss coverage have the fol- lowing characteristics: 11 to 15 years aged, medium -sized (the number of employees is 301 to 1000), pri- vate, with export behavior, non processing trade type, and belonging to the high technology enterprises. Based on the OLS and Probit regression this paper verifies the "productivity market selection effect", also finds that the improvement of total factor productivity can significantly promote the product quality upgrading, and prod- uct quality has a significant negative inhibition to business losses. Through endogenous test TFP, product quality and business losses have a significant causal effect. This conclusion provides some empirical evidence for Chinese government to strengthen the supply side reform, and guide enterprises to reallocate resources by improving TFP and product quality.
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期93-101,共9页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(15JZD023) 国家科技支撑计划课题(2015BAH27F01) 科技部公益性科研专项(201310202)
关键词 企业亏损 全要素生产率 产品质量 business losses total factor productivity product quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

二级参考文献334

同被引文献87

  • 1颜鹏飞,王兵.技术效率、技术进步与生产率增长:基于DEA的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):55-65. 被引量:725
  • 2姚先国,周礼,来君.技术进步、技能需求与就业结构——基于制造业微观数据的技能偏态假说检验[J].中国人口科学,2005(5):47-53. 被引量:74
  • 3Romer.Human Capital and Growth:Theory and Evidence[J].Journal Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1990,(1):251—286.
  • 4Aiyar,S.,Feyrer,J.A Contribution to the Empirics of Total Factor Productivity[Z].Dartmouth College Working Paper,2002.
  • 5Jones,B.F.The Knowledge Trap:Human Capital and Development Reconsidered[Z].NBER Working Paper,2008.
  • 6Irarrazabala,A.,Monxnes,A.,Ulltveit-Moe,K.H.Heterogeneous Firms or Heterogeneous Workers?Implications for Exporter Premia and the Gains from Trade[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2013,(3):839—849.
  • 7Benhabib,J.,Spiedel,M.M.The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development:Evidence from Aggregate Cross-country Data[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1994,(2):143—173.
  • 8Caselli,F.,Coleman,W.J.The World Technology Frontier[J].The American Economic Review,2006,(3):449—522.
  • 9Borensztein,E.,Gregorio,J.,Lee,J.W.How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic?[J].Journal of International Economics,2002,(1):115—135.
  • 10Vandenbussche,et al.Growth,Distance to Frontier and Composition of Human Capital[J].Journal of Economics Growth,2006,(2):97—127.

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部