期刊文献+

行人交织区运行状态分级方法与调控流程 被引量:1

Running Status Classification Method of Pedestrian Weaving Zone and Adjustment Process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行人换乘通道、换乘站厅常常出现不同方向人流交织,由于行人之间的交织行为会产生稳定的交织区,交织区对于步行设施的正常运行产生消极影响,导致通行能力、舒适度和安全性降低.采用实地调查数据建立简化交织区负效应模型,提出行人交织区运行状态变化的负效应阈值,将行人交织区划分为舒适、一般舒适和拥挤三级运行状态,结合HCM2010人行步道服务水平分级,定量分析行人交织区运行状态为一般舒适或拥挤、处于HCM2010E级服务水平时,不同隔离栏杆设置形式发挥的作用,并提出交织区运行状态调节流程,为步行设施交织区运营管理提供依据. A stable pedestrian weaving zone formed in the pedestrian transfer channels and transfer station hall, which would produce a negative impact on the pedestrian facilities, such as the reduction of the transportation capacity, safety and comfort. Based on the field investigation data, a negative effect model was established to discover negative effect threshold of the pedestrian weaving zones' running state by statistical analysis. The pedestrian weaving zone running state was proposed to be divided into three levels (comfortable level, generally comfortable level and crowded level). Based on the division standard of level of weaving zone and HCM 2010, an analysis was made of these three weaving zone running states to understand different roles played by different railing setting ways and the adjustment process of weaving zone running state was proposed, which would contribute to the design of pedestrian facilities and operation management.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期580-586,共7页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(51278363)
关键词 行人交织区 负效应模型 运行状态分级 栏杆设置形式 设置有效性 pedestrian weaving zone negative effect model running status classification railing setting form railingsetting effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1吴娇蓉,刘学丽,叶建红.轨道车站交织区栏杆设置有效性分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(1):82-89. 被引量:2
  • 2Muraleetha ran T, Adachi T, Hagiwara T, et al. Method to determine overall level of service of pedestrians on sidewalks and crosswalks based on total utility value [ C/CD] // Transportation Research Board. Washington D C: National Research Council, 2004.
  • 3林廉凯.捷运车站乘客动线人流模式与干扰量度之研究[D].台湾:交通大学,2002.
  • 4朱宸佐,透过熵参数建立行人流干扰指标之研究[D].台湾:国立台湾大学土木工程学系,2008.
  • 5WU Jiaorong, LU Sugang. Feature analysis and operation evaluation of pedestrian weaving zone [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2013: DOI: 10. 3141/2393-08.
  • 6TRB. Highway capacity manual 2010 [M]. Washington D C: National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, 2010.
  • 7WEN Ya, YAN Kefei, YU Chaowei. Level of service standards for pedestrian facilities in Shanghai Metro Stations[ C]// International Conference on Transportation Engineering. [S. l. ] : China Association for Science and Technology, China Communications and Trnaportation Association, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007: 2072-2078.
  • 8吴娇蓉,叶建红,陈小鸿.大型活动场馆参观人流服务水平分级研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(6):850-855. 被引量:10
  • 9俞盂骁.行人交互行为模式与特征研究[D].上海:同济大学,2015.

二级参考文献14

  • 1Transportation Research Board.Highway Capacity Manual 2000[M].Washington D C:National Research Council,2000.
  • 2Sisiopiku V P,ZHANG Xuesong.Pedestrian level of service and quality of operations assessment methods[C/CD].Washington D C:TRB 2002 Annual Meeting,2002.
  • 3叶建红,陈小鸿,吴娇蓉.大型活动游客参观特征及空间聚集效应分析[M]∥第一届中国智能交通年会组委会.第一届中国智能交通年会论文集.上海:同济大学出版社,2005:1130-1136.
  • 4Sano T, Shida K, TatebeK. An experimental study on pedestrian crossing conflicts by Physical index[J]. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering, 2001 (8) : 127.
  • 5Weng X, Feng Q. Impact analysis on pedestrian traffic flow in weave area of building[ C ]//2011 Second International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering. Piscataway: IEEE, 2011: 2215-2218.
  • 6FruinJ J. Pedestrian planning and design [M]. New York.. Metropolitan Association of Urban Designer and Environment Planner, 1971.
  • 7Wu J, Lu S. Feature analysis and operation evaluation of pedestrian weaving zone [J ]. National Research Council, Transportation Research Record, 2013, 66(1):155.
  • 8Kate K, Uehara T, Nakamura K, Yoshioka M. Analysis of pedestrian movement in bi-directional flow [ J ]. Architectural Institute of Japan, 1980, 289(4): 119.
  • 9Pattnaik S B, Hemalatha V. Evaluation of pedestrian facilities based on users' perception: Chennai as a case study Journal of the Institution of Engineers[J]. Civil Engineering Division, 2003, 83(3):221.
  • 10MurMeetha R T, Adachi T, Hagisara T. Method to determine overall level of service of pedestrians on sidewalks and crosswalks based on total utility value [ C/CD]//National Research Council. Washington D C:Transportation Research Board, 2004.

共引文献11

同被引文献9

引证文献1

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部