直接适用法的正当性考察被引量：2

On the Legitimacy of Lois D'application Immédiate

下载PDF

导出

摘要直接适用法所体现的单边主义立场,已经突破了萨维尼的理论预设。直接适用法的兴起并非偶然,它是欧陆国际私法发展到一定阶段顺应时代潮流所做的一种自我反省和调适,也是欧陆传统国际私法面对生存困境所做的一种自我救赎和完善。国际私法的范式的转换、价值取向的嬗变、功能主义的勃兴,以及公共秩序的式微,共同为直接适用法的产生提供了正当性理据。 The unilateralism position of lois d＇application immrdiate has broken through the pre- suppositions of Saigny＇s theory. The rise of lois d＇application immrdiate is not an accident, it＇s the self-reflection and self-adjustment of continental private international law in order to follow the trend of the times at a certain stage, and so it is a self-redemption and self-improvement of the traditional continental private international law in the face of survival predicament. The shift of paradigm, the evolution of value orientation, the flourish of functionalism, and the decline of ordre public together provide arguments of legitimacy for lois d＇application immediate.

作者杨华

机构地区湖南师范大学法学院

出处《时代法学》 2016年第2期107-114,共8页 Presentday Law Science

关键词直接适用法范式价值取向功能主义公共秩序 paradigm value orientation functionalism ordre public

分类号 D997 [政治法律—国际法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献32

1张春良.冲突法的范式进化论[J].法律科学（西北政法大学学报）,2010,28(4):40-51. 被引量：5
2Symeon C. Symeonides, Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress of Regress?, Kluwer Law International, 2000, pp. 43 -44.
3Ralf Michael, After the Revolution-Decline and Return of U. S. Conflicts of Laws, Yearbook of Private International Law, vol. 11 (2009), p. 30.
4Gerhard Kege|, The Crisis of Conflict of Laws, Recueil des Cours 112( 1964 -II), p. 91.
5Friedrich K. Juenger, American and European Conflicts Law,Bologna Symposium, Am. J. Comp. L. 30 (1982) ,p. 117.
6G. Aichele, Legal Realism and Twentieth-Century American Jurisprudence: The Changing Consensus, New York, Garland Publishing, Inc 1990, p. 4.
7C. Langdell, A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, Boston : Little, Brown, and Co. , 1871 ,pp. vi - vii," Preface".
8丹尼尔.A.法伯,刘秀华.法律形式主义举隅[J].中央政法管理干部学院学报,2001(1):49-52. 被引量：7
9[澳]迈克尔·J.温考普,玛丽·凯斯.冲突法中的政策与实用主义[M].阎愚译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2012,2.
10Jeffrey M. Shaman, The Vicissitudes of Choice of Law: The Restatement(First, Second) and Interest Analysis, buffalo L. Rev. 45( 1997), pp. 329 - 330.

二级参考文献31

1吕岩峰.和谐世界视阈中的国际私法观照--一以现代国际私法体系的构建为焦点[M]//中国国际私法学会2007年会论文集.
2Robert A. Leflar. Choice -Influencing Considerations in Conflicts Law. N. Y. U. L. Rev. , 1966, (41) : 267 -280.
3Symeon C. Symeonides. Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress? Kiuwer Law International, 2000.
4叶世斌.我被遮蔽和虚悬在这里[EB/OL].http://msn.ynet.com/view.jsp?oid=42810427&pageno=3.
5张祥龙蒋.《中华古学与现象学》,山东友谊出版社2008年版,第200-203页.
6[德]马丁·沃尔夫著.《陶际私法》,李浩培等译,法律出版社1988年版,第48页.
7洪汉鼎著.《诠释学--它的历史和当代发展》,人民出版社2005年版,第31-35页.
8Friedrich K. Juenger. Choice of Law and Multistate Justice. Boston Nijhoff, 1993, PI0.
9Arthur T nc Mebren. Choice of Law and the Problem of Justice [ J]. Law & Contemp. Prohs. , 1997, (41) : 43.
10Symeon C. Symeonides. Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress? Kluwer Law International, 2000.