期刊文献+

股市收益率高阶矩风险的产生机制检验 被引量:8

Testing the Generation Mechanism of Higher-Order-Moment Risk in Stock Market Returns
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过对现有理论文献的梳理,提炼了五个较为典型的关于高阶矩风险产生机制的理论假设。然后基于时变高阶矩建模思想,将这五个假设统一于同一个计量框架,并进行综合地实证检验,以期发掘具有"占优"作用的理论解释。以沪深股市收益率为样本研究发现,在这五个假设中,仅"波动率反馈"效应和"利空信息揭示"效应获得显著的实证支持。进一步分析指出,这两种效应会同时引起偏度和峰度风险,因而是高阶矩风险的主要产生机制。这一结果可为后续研究发展一个统一的理论框架提供实证参考。 Five pieces of theoretical prediction on the generation of higher order moment risk are refined and thus the corresponding hypotheses are formed after reviewing the existed literature. Employing the idea of modeling time variant higher-order-moment, these five pieces of hypothesis are involved in a unified econometric framework. An empirical analysis is conducted based on such model to find some dominated theoretical explanations. Sampling daily returns from Shanghai and Shenzhen stock market composite index, the results show that there are two hypotheses relevant to volatility feedback effect and bad news revelation effect are significantly supported but the other three are not. Further analysis indicates that these two effects can generate both skewness and kurtosis risk. Therefore, they are implied as the main generation mechanism of higher-order-moment risk. These results get out of the mess of opinions on the generation mechanism of higher-order-moment risk and thus can benefit further exploration of such topic under a unified theoretical framework
作者 方立兵 曾勇
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期27-36,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71401071) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年资助项目(14YJC790025) 江苏省自然科学基金青年资助项目(BK20130589)
关键词 高阶矩风险 波动率反馈 限制卖空 条件密度 higher-moment risk volatility feedback short-sale constraint conditional density
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Pindyck R S. Risk, inflation, and the stock market[J]. American Economic Review, 1984, 74(3): 335-351.
  • 2French K R, Schwert G W, Stambaugh R F. Expected stock returns and volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, 1987, 19(1): 3-29.
  • 3Campbell J Y, Hentschel L. No news is good news : An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1992, 31(3): 281 -318.
  • 4Hong H, Stein J C. Differences ofopinion, short-sales constraints, and market crashes E J2. Review of Finan- cial Studies, 2003, 16(2): 487-525.
  • 5Xu Jianguo. Price convexity and skewness[J]. Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(5): 2521-2552.
  • 6Engle R F. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom infla- tion[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 987-1007.
  • 7Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional het- eroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31 (3) : 307-327.
  • 8Romer D. Rational asset-price movements without news EJ]. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(5): 1112- 1130.
  • 9Abreu D, Brunnermeier M K. Bubbles and crashes[J]. Econometrica, 2003, 71(1): 173-204.
  • 10Glosten L R, Jagannathan R, Runkle D E. On the re- lation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks [J]. Journal of Fi- nance, 1993, 48(5)~ 1779-1801.

二级参考文献30

  • 1张维,张永杰.异质信念、卖空限制与风险资产价格[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(4):58-64. 被引量:111
  • 2伍燕然,韩立岩.不完全理性、投资者情绪与封闭式基金之谜[J].经济研究,2007,42(3):117-129. 被引量:213
  • 3滕泰,王国平,刘哲.2008,“暴涨暴跌模型VS正确的投资理念”,银河证券研究所专题研究报告.
  • 4Cao, H. , J. Coval and D. Hirshleifer, 2002, "Sidelined Investors, Trading- Generated News and Security Returns", Review of Financial Studies 15 ( 2 ) , 615 - 48.
  • 5Chang, E. C. , J. W. Cheng and Y. H. Yu,2007,Short -Sales Constraints and Price.Discovery: Evidence from the Hong Kong Market,Journal of Finance ,2097 -2121.
  • 6Chamberlain, G. , 1980, "Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data", Review of Economic Studies, 47,225 -238.
  • 7Chen, J. , H. Hong and J. C. Stein,2001, Forecasting Crashes: Trading Volume, Past Returns and Conditional Skew ness in Stock Prices, Journal of Financial Economics61 (3) ,345 -381.
  • 8Gennotte, G. and H. Leland, 1990, " Market Liquidity, Hedging and Crashes". American Economic Review 80,999 - 1021.
  • 9Hong, H. and J. C. Stein,2003, "Differences of Opinion, Short -Sales Constraints and Market Crashes", Review of Financial Studies 16 (2) , 487 - 525.
  • 10Marin, J.M. and J. Olivier,2008, The Dog That Did Not Bark: Insider Trading and Crashes. Journal of Finance,Forthcoming.

共引文献270

同被引文献82

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部