摘要
制度化建设以权威形态的建构为前提。梳理中国乡村调解权威的嬗变轨迹,是把握中国基层调解发展脉络,思考其制度完善问题的重要楔入口。就此而言,韦伯关于传统型权威、克里斯玛型权威、法理型权威的经典区分,成为探讨调解权威嬗变问题重要的理论参考与分析工具。通过理论借鉴与现实反思可以发现,当代中国乡村调解权威贫瘠而匮乏:传统型权威整体式微,克里斯玛型权威难以为继,新兴的法理型权威的生长举步维艰。要走出调解权威的现实困境,提升基层调解的威信力,就要引导传统型权威、克里斯玛型权威的法治化转型。而就当前中国基层司法现状而言,引导二者转型的重点,不在于调解制度内部的修订与完善,而在于外部法治建设的支持与保障。
The institutionalization is based on the premise of the construction of authority patterns. Combing transmutation orbit of Rural Mediation Authority in China is the crux of grasping the development course of grass-roots mediation and addressing the problem of its perfection. For that matter,Max Weber divided the authority into three types: traditional authority,Charismatic authority,legal authority,the distinction of which is a valid theoretical reference and analytic tool. Through the theoretical reference and practical reflection,it shows that the authority of rural mediation in China is arid and scanty:traditional authority wanes on the whole,Charismatic authority is unsustainable,the emerging legal authority is stuck in mud. It must convert traditional authority and Charismatic authority into legalization. However,the focus of its transformation is not to revise and improve mediation system as such,but to perfect the legal structure from the outside.
出处
《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2016年第2期51-55,共5页
Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金重大招标项目"构建全民共建共享的社会矛盾纠纷化解机制研究"(152DC029)
湖南省社科基金项目"社会治理创新视阈下的人民调解"(14JD58)
湖南省教育厅社科项目"文学素养与法律职业素养研究"(12C0381)
关键词
乡村调解
权威嬗变
传统型权威
克里斯玛型权威
法理型权威
rural mediation
transmutation of authority
traditional authority
Charismatic authority
legal authority