1Hinton, J. M., Experiences: An Inquiry into Some Ambiguities, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973:10, 26-27.
2Adrian Haddock and Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008: 35-56,35-56, 57- 94, 105-109.
3Ram Neta,"In Defence of Disjunctivism", in Dis- junctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, Fiona Macpherson and Adrian Haddock (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008:311-329.
4Snowdon, P. F., "The Formulation of Disjunc- tivism: A response to Fish", Proceedings of the Aris- totelian Society, New Series,(105) ,2005a: 136.
5Langsam, Harold, "The Theory of Appearing De- fended", Philosophical Studies (120),1997: 33-59.
6Tye,M., "Intentionalism and the Argument from No Common Content", Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1), 2007:589-613.
7Sturgeon,Scott, "Visual Experience", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series,(98),1998: 179-200.
8Martin, M.G.F., "The Limits of Self-Aware- ness", Philosophical Studies(120),2004: 37-89,37-89.
9Millar, Alan, "The Idea of Experience", Proceed- ings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, (97), 1996: 75 -90.
10McDowell.John, "Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge", Proceedings of the British Academy, (68), 1982: 455-479.
