期刊文献+

个体受贿行为倾向与反腐策略

Individual Behavior of Corruption and Anti-Corruption Strategies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前关于腐败问题的研究多集中在政治学和法学领域,并偏重于对腐败行为的社会原因、政治原因等宏观层面的理论分析,但普遍缺乏在微观层面对个体受贿行为决策的影响因素及一般规律的实证性探索。本文在行为决策学的视阈下,对个体受贿行为的选择倾向进行了研究,结果发现:当损失时间和损失概率都不确定时,被试会更倾向于选择受贿;当损失时间确定但损失概率不确定时,被试可能遭受的损失程度越大,其受贿倾向越弱;当损失概率确定但损失时间不确定时,被试可能遭受的损失程度越大,其受贿倾向越弱。 Currently, the researches on corruption are mostly concerned by the political scientists and jurists, they are interested in the social and political causes of corruption, and get used to do the theoretical analysis at the macro level, but there are less researches focus on the individual decision mechanism when faced to the bribe-taking situation at the micro level. This study explored the individual's bribe-taking decision tendency on the behavioral decision perspective, the results shows:when the loss time and loss probability were both uncertain ,the subjects were more likely to take the bribe; when the loss time was certain, the loss probability was uncertain, and the loss that subjects might have suffered increased, their tendency of taking the bribe became weaker; when the loss probability was certain, the loss time was uncertain, and the loss that subjects might have suffered increased, their tendency of taking the bribe became weaker.
作者 杨金桥
出处 《东北财经大学学报》 2016年第3期12-18,共7页 Journal of Dongbei University of Finance and Economics
基金 辽宁省社会科学规划基金项目"心理学视阈下的大学生人生观教育实践研究"(L14BSZ043)
关键词 个体受贿 行为决策学 腐败行为 反腐策略 individual bribe-laking behavioral decision making corruption behavior anti-corruption strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1薛进展,谢杰.对“两高”最新受贿罪司法解释的反思[J].法学,2007(10):31-39. 被引量:17
  • 2周罗庚,夏禹龙.从人治反腐转向制度反腐[J].科学社会主义,2006(4):61-66. 被引量:13
  • 3张仲涛.制度反腐及其构建原则[J].湖北社会科学,2005(7):51-53. 被引量:2
  • 4田银华,龙朝阳,易菲.基于行为决策理论的腐败行为分析及其治理[J].当代财经,2008(2):7-12. 被引量:7
  • 5Dong, B. , Torgler, B. Causes of Corruption: Evidence from China [ J ] . China Economic Review, 2013, 26 (9) : 152-169.
  • 6Lee, W. S. , Guven, C. Engaging in Corruption: The Influence of Cultural Values and Contagion Effects at the Microlevel? [ J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2013, 39(12): 287-300.
  • 7Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. Choices, Values, and Frames[ J ]. American Psychologist, 1984, 39 ( 5 ) : 341-350.
  • 8Levin, L, Gaeth, G. E. How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product [ J ]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15 (3) : 374-378.
  • 9McElroy, T. , Seta, J. J. , Waring, D. A. Reflections of the Self: How Self-Esteem Determines Decision Framing and Increases Risk Taking [ J ]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2007, 20 (3) : 223 -240.
  • 10Loewenstein, G. F. Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice[J]. Management Science, 1988, 34 (2) : 200-214.

二级参考文献118

共引文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部