期刊文献+

基于主观福利评价思路估计中国家户等价规模——一种准确比较家户生活水准的应用工具 被引量:3

An Estimate of Chinese Household Equivalence Scales Based on a Subjective Well-being Assessment Approach:An Application Tool for Comparing the Standard of Living Accurately
原文传递
导出
摘要 家户等价规模反映了不同规模和年龄结构组成家户与参照家户获得相同消费福利时,所需必要消费的换算比例。因此,在比较这些家户的个体生活水准时,常使用家户等价规模来进行调整,以便能够精确识别贫困人口,准确评估贫困和不平等程度。本文使用中国健康与养老追踪调查2013年数据,基于主观福利评价的思路,估计了不同规模和年龄结构组成家户的等价成人规模。在仅考虑家户人口规模时,城镇家户的规模经济系数为0.751,农村家户为0.647,表明城镇家庭消费支出的规模经济程度低于农村家户,体现了不同的消费特征。而在加入家庭成员年龄结构的影响后,得到成年人计算等价成人规模的折算系数为0.389,未成年人为0.521,体现了家户中成年人和未成年人各自的生活成本。这些估计参数可供政策制定者及研究者在进行家户间生活水准比较以及扶贫援助项目时予以参考。 Household equivalence scale is a scale that is used to calculate necessary consumption for the household composed by different size and age structure members so that their welfare is equal to that of reference household.When comparing the living standard of individuals living under different households which are constituted by different household scales and age structure,household equivalence scales is used to adjust them so as to identify the poor,evaluate the poverty and inequality exactly.This paper uses data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study in 2013 to estimate household equivalence scales based on subjective living standard assessment approach.The results show that the economies of scale elasticity is 0.751 in urban area and 0.647 in rural area if we only consider the impact of household size.It means that the degree of economies of scale in household expenditure in urban area is lower than that in rural areas,which shows different consumption types.After considering the impact of the age structure of household members,the results show that the second and more adults are calculated as 0.389 equivalent adult and a child is calculated as 0.521 equivalent adult.It shows different living costs for adults and children.These parameters can be applied to compare the household welfare level,and determine amount of aid for poverty alleviation programs.
作者 赵锐
出处 《经济评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期72-85,共14页 Economic Review
关键词 家户等价规模 家户支出 主观生活水平评价 Household Equivalence Scales Household Expenditure Subjective Living Standard Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1万广华,张茵,子璇(校对).收入增长与不平等对我国贫困的影响[J].经济研究,2006,41(6):112-123. 被引量:173
  • 2Biewen, M., and A.Juhasz.2014." Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales." IZA Discussion Paper, No.7209.
  • 3Bishop, J., A.Grodner, H.Liu, and I.Ahamdanech-Zarco.2014." Subjective Poverty Equivalence Scales for Euro Zone Countries." The Journal of Economic Inequality 12(2) : 265-278.
  • 4Blundell, R., and A.Lewbel. 1991. "The Information Content of Equivalence Scales." Journal of Econometrics 50(1-2) : 49-68.
  • 5Browning, M., P. Chiappori, and A. Lewbel. 2013. "Estimating Consumption Economies of Scale, Adult Equivalence Scales, and Household Bargaining Power." The Review of Economic Studies 80 (4) : 1267-1303.
  • 6Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus, and T. M. Smeeding. 1988. " Equivalence Scales, Well - Being, Inequality, and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study (Lis) Database." Review of lncome and Wealth 34(2) : 115-142.
  • 7Deaton, A.S., J.Ruiz-Castillo, and D.Thomas. 1989. "The Influence of Household Composition on Household Expenditure Patterns: Theory and Spanish Evidence." The Journal of Political Economy 97 (1) :179-200.
  • 8Diener, E., R.lnglehart, and L.Tay.2013. "Theory and Validity of Life Satisfaction Scales." Social Indicators Research 112(3) : 497-527.
  • 9Frey, B.S., and A. Stutzer, 2000." Maximizing Happiness?" German Economic Review 1 (2) : 145-167.
  • 10Goedhart, T., V. Halberstadt, A. Kapteyn, and B. Van Praag. 1977. "The Poverty Line: Concept and Measurement." Journal of Human Resources 12 (4) : 503- 520.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Brandt, L, and Holz, C.A, 2004, "Spatial Price Differences in China: Estimates and Implications", Manuscript, Social Science Division,Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.
  • 2Datt, G. and Ravallion, M, 1992, " Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures: A Decomposition with Applications to Brazil and India in the 1980", Journal of Development Economics 38, 275-295.
  • 3Figini, P, 1998, "Inequality Measures, Equivalent Scales and Adjustment for HousehoId Size and Composition", Paper Presented at the 50th General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Cambridge, August.
  • 4Foster, J, Greer, J. and Thorbecke, E, 1984, "A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures", Econometrica 52, 761-765.
  • 5Gustafsson, B, Li S. and Sato, H, 2004, "Can A Subjective Poverty Line be Applied to China? Assessing Poverty among Urban Residentsin 1999", Journal of International Development 16, 1089-1107.
  • 6Kakwani N. and Subbarao, K, 1990, "Rural Poverty and Its Alleviation in India", Economic and Political Weekly 15, A2-16.
  • 7Huppi, M. and RavaUion, M, 1991, '+char(34)+'The Sectoral Structure of Poverty during An Adjustment Period: Evidence for Indonesia in the Mid-1980s'+char(34)+', World Development 19,1653-1678.
  • 8Jain, L.R. and Tendulkar, S.D, 1990, "Role of Growth and Distribution in the Observed Change in Headcount Ratio Measure of Poverty:A Decomposition Exercise for India", Indian Economic Review 25, 165-205.
  • 9Kakwani, N, 1997, "On Measuring Growth and Inequality Components of Poverty with Application to Thailand", Discussion Paper, Schoolof Economics, the University of New South Wales.
  • 10Kakwani, N, 1993, "Poverty and Economic Growth with Application to Cote D'lvoire", Review of Income and Wealth 39, 121-139.

共引文献172

同被引文献58

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部