期刊文献+

上薗联想测评法:一种便于教师应用的道德教育测评工具 被引量:2

Kamizono Association Method: An Assessment Tool for Moral Education
原文传递
导出
摘要 日本学者上薗恒太郎(Kohtaro Kamizono)自1990年代研究开发联想测验法,用于评价道德教育的效果,笔者将之称为"上薗联想测评法"。它通过在一个学习集体内让每个被试对特定的提示语进行自由联想,再通过特定的联想数据处理技术,呈现该集体在联想词数量、种类以及每个联想词和每一类联想词的词数、词频与联想人数等,由此读取该集体成员的意识、态度和情意状况及其变化。它包含了量化分析和质性分析,保证了测评的客观性,同时也使研究者和实践者能够分享对测验结果的丰富解读。实施联想测验、处理和呈现联想结果只需要很短时间,实践者自己就可以在日常教学中运用联想测验法,了解自己教学的效果,反思并改进教学。 Since 1990,Kohtaro Kamizono,a Japanese researcher,has began invented the Association Method,which used for evaluation of moral lessons. It allows each subject to do some free association with cue word through collective learning,then through the specific associative word processing techniques,showing the information about the collective response words,such as quantity,type,as well as the proportion of each association word and each type of association and the number of subjects and so on,aiming tofind the situation and change of the collective consciousness,attitude,sensibility. The Association Method includes quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis,not only to ensure the objectivity of evaluation,but also enable researchers and practitioners to share rich interpretation of the test results. The implementation of association test,the processing and rendering of association results take only a very short time. Practitioners themselves can use it to learn their teaching effect comprehensively,then they can reflect and improve their teaching.
作者 高峡 沈晓敏
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期77-88,共12页 Global Education
基金 2011年教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地"十二五"重大项目"义务教育阶段思想品德类学科核心能力模型及测评研究"(项目编号:11JJD880009)阶段性研究成果
关键词 联想法 道德教育测评 上薗恒太郎 association method assessment for moral education Kohtaro Kamizono
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1蔡华俭.Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):339-344. 被引量:133
  • 2上圃恒太郎、森永謙二「自己肯定感奁育7冬道徳授業一協同T、学上思0呤9 一」,「九州地区国立大学教育系_文系研究論文集」Vol. 1,No. 1(2013/10).

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Greenwald A G, McGhee E, Schwartz J L K. Measuring Individual Differences in Implicit Cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(5): 181~198
  • 2[2]Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit Social Cognition. Attitudes, Self-Esteem and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1): 4~27
  • 3[3]Farnham S D, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Implicit self-esteem. In: Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A ed. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Inc, 1999. 230~248
  • 4[4]Greenwald A G, Klinger M R, Liu T J. Unoconcious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory and cognition, 1989,17: 35~47
  • 5[5]Murphy S T, Zajoc R B. Affect ,cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1993, 64: 723~739
  • 6[6]Dasgupta N, McGhee D E, Greenwald A G, Banaji M R. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36: 316~328
  • 7[7]McConnell A R, Leibold J M. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001, 37: 435~442
  • 8[8]Greenwald A G, Farham S D. Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-soncept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(6): 1022~1038
  • 9[9]Bosson J K, Swann W B Jr, Pennebaker J W. Stalking the Perfect Measure of Implicit Self-Esteem: The Blind and the Elephant Revisited? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000,79(4): 631~643
  • 10[10]Cunningham W A, Preacher K J, Banaji M R. Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity. Psychological Science, 2001,12(2): 163~170

共引文献132

同被引文献24

引证文献2

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部