期刊文献+

共识与争议:个人信息保护的价值目标 被引量:8

Consensus and Disputes: What the Purpose of the Personal Data Protection is for
下载PDF
导出
摘要 忽视对隐私与个人信息的保护,将它们描述为过时的理念并把它们视为反进步的、花费高昂的、不利于政治体福利的主张,会形成两种系统性风险。第一,损害到民众批判性地践行公民权的能力与范围;第二,损害到社会创新的能力与我们看重的政治、思想、商业文化的持续活力。自由的个体与自由的社会一直是人们追求的共生理想,个人信息保护的目标是为了尊重个人的人格尊严与自由,保护公民隐私;避免个体与社会的共同价值观沿着因循守旧的老路前行;培育民众的批判精神,促进自由、民主、多元社会的建构。而保护信息控制者合法地处理信息的利益、减少数据贸易壁垒、维护国家信息主权的多元价值追求,不宜成为个人信息保护所追求的价值目标。 Over and over again,privacy is cast as old-fashioned at best and downright harmful at worst-anti progressive,overly costly,and inimical to the welfare of the body politic. In fact,the ignorance of the private information protection will create two kinds of large systemic risk. First,freedom from surveillance,whether public or private,is foundational to the capacity for critical self-reflection and informed citizenship. Second,privacy is also the foundation to the capacity for innovation,so the negligence of personal privacy will jeopardize the continuing vitality of the political and intellectual cultures that we say we value. The liberal self and the liberal democratic society are symbiotic ideals. Privacy's goal,simply put,is to respect for individual's dignity and freedom,ensure that the developments of subjectivity and communal values do not proceed in lockstep,and also promote the freedom,democracy,pluralistic society's construction. The data controller's legitimate interest,trade barrier and informational sovereignty should not become the main goals for the protection of personal data.
作者 李媛
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》 北大核心 2016年第3期59-64,共6页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)
基金 广西壮族自治区法学会2015法学重点课题:大数据时代个人信息的法律保护(GFKT(2015)B13)
关键词 个人信息 隐私 创新 自由主义 personal data privacy innovation liberalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1ANDERSON H R. The Mythical Right to Obscurity: A Pragmatic Defense of No Privacy in Public [ J ]. A Jour- nal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 2012 ( 3 ) : 543- 602.
  • 2BENNETr C J, RAAB C D. The Governance of Priva-cy[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2006: 8-14.
  • 3FEDAL TRADE COMMISSON. Protecting Consumer Privacy In An Era of Rapid Change: Recommendations for Businesses and Policymakers [ EB/OL ]. ( 2012- 03- 26) [ 2015-03- 02 ]. https ://www. ftc. gov/sites/default/ files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission- report-protecting-consumer-privacy-era-rapid-change- recommendations/120326privacyreport, pdf.
  • 4丹尼尔·沙勒夫.隐私不保的年代[M].林铮颉,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2011:122.
  • 5维克托·迈尔-舍恩伯格,肯尼思·库克耶.大数据时代[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:5-25.
  • 6COHEN J E. What privacy is for[J]. Harvard Law Re- view,2013 (7) :1904-1933.
  • 7KORFF D. Study on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of Legal Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data relating to such Persons [ EB/OL ]. (2008-10-24) [ 2015-01-27 ]. http://papers, ssrn. com/sol3/papers, cfm? abstract_id = 1288583.
  • 8LINDSAY D. An Exploration of the Conceptual Basis of Privacy and the Implications for the future of Australian Privacy Law [ J ]. Melbourne University Law Review, 2005(29) :131-133.
  • 9BYGRAVE L A. Data Privacy Law:An International Per- spective[ M ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press ,2013.
  • 10THOMSON J J. The Right to Privacy [ J ]. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1975 ( 4 ) : 295-314.

二级参考文献7

共引文献216

同被引文献50

引证文献8

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部