期刊文献+

基于“哈尔滨共识”报告多囊卵巢综合征大型临床试验的不良事件 被引量:3

Discussion on adverse events in large clinical trials about PCOS based on 'Harbin Consensus'
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于不孕症临床试验国际报告标准-哈尔滨共识,以一项多中心、大样本、双盲的针刺临床随机对照试验为例,通过专人专项的围产医学小组负责制等策略来收集不良事件(AE),共收集AE近2 000件。AE发生的人群包括受试者(1 000余件)、受试者丈夫(3件),胎儿及新生儿(近40件);其分别发生在干预期间(近1 000件),妊娠期间(700余件),产后(近10件),胎儿及新生儿期间(近40件);其中和干预措施及多囊卵巢综合征相关的特异性AE为500余件,非特异性AE为600余件,偶发AE近10件;严重不良事件70余件。但仍存在一定不足之处,今后需改进。 Based on the international report standard about infertility clinical trials: ‘Harbin Consensus', taking a multicenter, large sample, double-blind acupuncture clinical randomized controlled trial for an example, a total of nearly 2 000 cases of adverse events were collected through the specialization of perinatal medical group responsibility system and other strategies. The population of serious adverse events included subjects(more than 1 000), subject's husband(3), fetus and neonate(nearly 40); the stages of their occurrence were the intervention period(nearly 1 000), pregnancy duration(more than 700), postpartum(close to 10) and fetal and neonatal period(nearly 40); the number of specific adverse events which was associated with the intervention and polycystic ovarian syndrome was more than 500, nonspecific adverse events was more than 600, accidental adverse events was nearly 10; serious adverse events was more than 70. But there were still some shortcomings, and the collection about adverse events needs to be improved.
出处 《中华中医药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期4296-4299,共4页 China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金 国家重大科技专项-中医公益性行业专项(No.201107005) 世界中医药学会联合会合作项目(No.WFCMS-2016-001) 黑龙江中医药大学研究生创新科研项目(No.2015004)~~
关键词 多囊卵巢综合征 临床试验 不良事件 针刺 哈尔滨共识 Polycystic ovary syndrome Clinical trial Adverse event Acupuncture Harbin Consensus
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1魏建江.从中药不良反应的客观性探讨建立药物警戒系统[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3(4):190-191. 被引量:3
  • 2Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D G. CONSORT Group (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials[J]. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 2001 Sep,91(8):437-442.
  • 3Ioannidis J P, Evans S J , Gotzsehe P C, et al. Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement[J]. Ann Intern Med,2004,141(10):781-788.
  • 4ICH Street Committee. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Definitions and term inology associated w ith clinical safety experience[EB/OL]. 1994-10-27[2009-12-12]. http://www. ccchina.net/article.asp?articleid=286.
  • 5Brief Introduction to Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. [EB/OL]. [2009-12-12].http://www.jtcm.net.cn/include.
  • 6Ioannidis J P, Lau J. Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas[J]. JAMA,2001, Jan 24-31,285(4):437-44.3.
  • 7Panagiotis N P, Rachel C, Kristian W, et al.Safety reporting in randomized trials of mental health interventions[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2004,161:1692-1697.
  • 8Derry S, Loke Y K, Aronson J K. Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials[J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2001, 1:7.
  • 9Loke Y K, Derry S. Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials a systematic survey[J]. BMC Clinical Pharmacology, 2001, 1:3.
  • 10Mclntosh H M, Woolacott N F, BagnaU A M. Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2004 Jul, 19(4):19.

共引文献20

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部