期刊文献+

张力腿平台系泊风险评估方法研究 被引量:1

Risk assessment of mooring for tension leg platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章结合模糊综合评判法、层次分析法以及概率论提出了一种风险分析的评估方法,识别了系泊中的风险因素,建立完善了相应的风险评估指标体系,并将其应用于设计中或已服役作业的张力腿平台系泊风险评估。将不同风险评估结果视为风险的总体的随机样本,用概率论和置信区间对风险评估结果进行置信度评价。克服了单一评价方案主观性太强的弱点,使评价更具有客观性和可信性。经过分析和计算实例表明,该系泊风险评估方法是适用和有效的。利用获取的评价结果,识别设计或已建成服役的张力腿平台系泊风险指数高的风险因素,并采取有效措施,加强培训及时检修设备,以防止意外的发生。结合一型设计中的张力腿平台,应用文中提出的数值风险评估模型对该平台的系泊系统进行了风险评估。结果表明该方法可以对张力腿平台的系泊风险评估中的主观因素进行客观有效的评估。并可以推广应用于其他海上结构物的风险评估问题中。 Based on the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and Probability Theory, this paper put forward an analysis method of risk assessment, established the corresponding assessment criteria system, and applied to the design or were delivered of Tension Leg Platform(TLP) mooring risk assessment. Analysis and calculation example show that the risk assessment method for mooring is applicable and effective. Making use of the risk assessment result, identify the major risk factors of TLP which is designed or in service, and take effective measures to strengthen the training and maintain the equipment in time, could prevent the occurrence of accidents. Combined with a TLP in design, apply the numerical risk assessment model was applied to the platform of risk assessment for mooring system.The results show that this method can be objectively and effectively used to assess the subjective factors in the mooring risk assessment of TLP. And it can be applied in the risk assessment of other offshore structures.
作者 吴昊 林焰
出处 《船舶力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期600-612,共13页 Journal of Ship Mechanics
关键词 张力腿平台 系泊风险评估 评估指标体系 评估方法 模糊综合评判法 层次分析法 概率论 Tension Leg Platform risk assessment of mooring assessment criteria system assessment approach fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method analytic hierarchy process theory of probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1方银霞,包更生,金翔龙.21世纪深海资源开发利用的展望[J].海洋通报,2000,19(5):73-77. 被引量:29
  • 2Coelho D K, Roisenberg M, Filho P Jd F, et al. Risk assessment of drilling and completion operations in petroleum wells using a monte carlo and a neural network approach[C]. Proceedings of the 37th conference on Winter simulation. Winter Simulation Conference, 2005:1892-1897.
  • 3Taroun A, Yang J B, Lowe D. Construction risk modeling and assessment: Insights from a literature review[J]. The Built &Human Environment Review, 2011, 4: 87-97.
  • 4Zeng J, An M, Smith N J. Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assess- ment[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2007, 25: 589-600.
  • 5Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F. A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment[J]. International Journal of Project Management, 2011, 29(2): 220-231.
  • 6Osbom R W, Mill water H R. Application of probabilistic sensitivities in probabilistic fatigue analysis of gas turbine en- gine disks[R]. AIAA-2005- 2147, 2005.
  • 7陈捷俊,周莉.FPSO单点系泊系统风险与检验[J].石油工程建设,2014,40(4):24-28. 被引量:11
  • 8杨光,张建勇,王宁,王浩.在役水上软钢臂式系泊系统风险评价简述[J].科技创新导报,2015,12(6):242-245. 被引量:5
  • 9熊志坚.我国VLCC系泊风险分析及预控对策[J].物流工程与管理,2009,31(6):132-134. 被引量:2
  • 10景勇.两种不同系泊系统的风险对比[C].2007年度海洋工程学术会议论文集,2007:660-664.

二级参考文献44

共引文献61

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部