期刊文献+

潮流与现实悖反:我国机关法人之定位与重构 被引量:11

Trend against with Reality:The Definition of China's Legal Person of Government Units and Its Reconstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 虽然国内外主流公私法理论基本认可国家主体性二元结构理论,大陆法传统更是认可国家的法人地位而否定国家机关的法人资格,并在立法上形成了公共机构非法人化的事实,但我国受前苏联国家特殊民事主体理论和国家机关法人理论影响,从20世纪50年代开始,就在立法和理论上认可了国家机关的法人地位并延续至今。我国这种国家机关全面法人化的立法事实不仅与世界范围内存在的非法人化潮流形成逆反,造成公法人向私法的遁入,而且与我国司法实践中普遍存在的国家机关的非法人化形成悖反,使机关法人的独立责任在相当程度上成为虚名。因此,在界分公法与私法的基础上,将国家机关的行为主要限定在公法领域,从而在私法领域中原则上否定其独立法人地位,只令其具有辅助国家私法人格与公共职能实现之作用,只有为实现公共利益与公共职能之必要时,例外地承认其独立法人地位。 Although the dual structure theory of national subjectivity has been almost acknowledged by the dominant theory of public and private laws both at home and abroad,the tradition of continental law prefers to acknowledge the nation's legal person status but deny the legal person qualification of state organs,and comes into being the fact of the non-legal personalization of public authorities in legislation.Yet influenced by the former Soviet Union's theories of special civil subject and state organ as legal person,China has acknowledged the legal person status of its state organs legislatively and theoretically since the 1950 s and continued until now.The legislative fact of complete legal personalization of state organs in China is conflicted not only with the trend of non-legal personalization all around world,giving rise to the retreat from the legal person of public law into private law,but also with the non-legal personalization of state organs ubiquitous in China's juridical practice,resulting in the independent responsibility of official organ as legal person only existing in name only to a considerable degree.Hence,based on the demarcation between public and private laws,the behavior of state organs should be limited mainly in the field of public law,in order to deny their status of independent legal person and make them have the function of assisting to implement the country's personality in private law and its public functions.Only when it is necessary to realize the public interests and public functions could the state organs' status of independent legal person be acknowledged exceptionally.
作者 王春梅
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期100-108,共9页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(13YJA820047)
关键词 苏联法 国家机关 全面法人化 Law of the Soviet Union State Organs Comprehensive Legal Personalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1西南政法学院函授部.中国新民主主义革命时期法制建设资料选编:第3册[G].重庆:西南政法学院函授部,1982:2.
  • 2布都拉西.苏维埃民法:上[M].北京:中国人民大学民法教研室,1954:94.
  • 3克依里洛娃.苏维埃民法:上[M].北京:北京政法学院民法教研室,1958:64.
  • 4B.n.格里巴诺夫,C.M.科尔涅耶夫.苏联民法:上册[M].中国社会科学院法学研究所民法经济法研究室,译.北京:法律出版社,1984:147; 152.
  • 5B.T.斯米尔诺夫.苏联民法:上[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1987:135-137.
  • 6中国人民大学法律系民法教研室.中华人民共和国民法原理:上册[M].校内用书,1980:40-41.
  • 7法学教材编辑部.民法原理[M],北京:法律出版社,1983.
  • 8崔拴林.论我国私法人分类理念的缺陷与修正——以公法人理论为主要视角[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2011,29(4):83-94. 被引量:26
  • 9КУРГАНОВА ЛБПРАВОСУБЪЕКТНОСТЬ РОССИ ЙСКОЙ Федерации вовнешнеэкономических отношениях гражданско-првоын аспекты М Иэдво МГУК.,2002.c.l9.
  • 10汉斯-J.沃尔夫,奥托.巴霍夫,罗尔夫.施托贝尔.行政法:第1卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.

二级参考文献110

共引文献253

同被引文献189

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部