摘要
通过反思以伽达默尔和利科为代表的哲学诠释学中关于要不要(科学)方法之争,可以肯定,在探索和寻求法律真理过程中方法不能缺席。诠释法律的方法在人类认识视野中具有多样性、独立性和自在性,在本体视野中是非自治、非独立的,而在实践视野中则具有实用功利性特征。
By rethinking the controversy over the necessity of scientific approaches in the science of annotation whose main figures were Gadamer and Rieoeur, we are sure that approaches should not be absent in the course of exploration and search for the truth of law. The approaches to annotating law have diversity, independent character and free character in man' s understanding vision , are not autonomous and not independent in noumenon vision, and have practical character of utility in practical vision.
出处
《学习与探索》
CSSCI
北大核心
2001年第5期30-36,共7页
Study & Exploration
关键词
诠释方法
诠释学法学
诠释法律
approaches to annotation
Law studies of annotation
annotating law