期刊文献+

枯草杆菌、肠球菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效分析

Bacillus subtilis and enterococcus double viable capsules in treatment of ulcerative colitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨枯草杆菌、肠球菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊治疗溃疡性结肠炎的效果。方法收集本院2014年1月至2015年6月收治的100例溃疡性结肠炎患者,随机分为对照组与实验组。对照组给予美沙拉嚷治疗,实验组加服枯草杆菌、肠球菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊,比较两组整体治疗效果、复发率、缓解与维持时间、ESR、CRP与不良反应。结果实验组治疗总有效率(94%)与维持时间[(0.69±0.24)年]显著高于对照组[74%,(0.51±0.16)年],缓解时间[(50.14±9.15)d]显著低于对照组[(57.47±9.84)d],差异有统计学意义(x2=7.440,t=3.922、3.857,P〈0.01);实验组治疗后ESR[(14.71±7.04)mm/h]与CRP水平[(10.15±3.53)mg/L]显著低于对照组[(20.15±8.25)mm/h,(19.53±4.39)mg/L],差异有统计学意义(t=3.547、11.774,P〈n01),复发率(14%)明显低于对照组(32%),差异有统计学意义(x2=4.534,P〈0.05);两组总体不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(16%VS.10%,Y。=0.796,P〉0.05)。结论枯草杆菌、肠球菌二联活菌肠溶胶囊治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效显著,且安全性较高,具有借鉴性。 Objective To investigate the effect of bacillus subtilis and enterococcus double viable capsules in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Methods 100 patients with ulcerative colitis admitted into our hospital from January, 2014 to June, 2015 were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group. The control group were treated with mesalazine and in addition the experimental group with bacillus subtilis and enterococcus double viable capsules. The overall curative effect, recurrence rate, remission and maintenance times, ESR, CRP, and adverse reactions were compared between these two groups. Results The overall response rate, maintenance time, and remission time were 94%, (0.69 ±0.24) year, (50.14±9.15) d in the experimental group and were 74%, (0.51 ± 0.16) year, and (57.47 ± 9.84) d in the control group, with statistical differences (X 2=7.440, t=3.922, 3.857, P〈0.01). After the treatment, the ESR, CRP level, recurrence rate were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group [ (14.71±7.04) mm/h vs. (20.15 ±8.25) mm/h, (10.15 ± 3.53) rag/ L vs. (19.53 ±4.39) mm/h, and 14% vs. 32%], with statistical differences (t=-3.547,11.774, P〈0.01;X 2=4.534, P〈0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between these two groups (16% vs. 10%, X 2=0.796, P〉0.05). Conclusions Bacillus subtilis and enterococcus double viable capsules in the treatment of ulcerative colitis is effective and safe and is of reference.
作者 杨修方
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2016年第10期1442-1444,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 枯草杆菌 肠球菌 烧伤 溃疡性结肠炎 治疗效果 不良反应 Bacillus subtilis Enterococci Bums Ulcerative colitis Treatment effect Adverse reactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献75

  • 1白爱平,欧阳钦,胡仁伟.双歧杆菌抑制小鼠实验性结肠炎肠道炎症反应的研究[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(6):344-347. 被引量:13
  • 2陈超,魏克伦,姚裕家,陈大庆.早产儿管理指南[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(3):188-191. 被引量:323
  • 3韩英.益生菌治疗炎症性肠病的作用机制研究进展[J].中华内科杂志,2007,46(1):76-77. 被引量:8
  • 4邵肖梅,叶鸿瑶,丘小汕.实用新生儿学[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:807-808.
  • 5潘国宗 刘彤华 见:潘国宗 曹世植9. 主编.溃疡性结肠炎[A].见:潘国宗,曹世植9.,主编.现代胃肠病学.第Ⅰ版[C].北京:科学出版社,1994.1246-1247.
  • 6潘国宗 刘彤华.Crohn病[A].见:潘国宗 曹世植 主编.现代胃肠病学[C].北京:科学出版社,1994.1154.
  • 7樋渡信夫 渡边浩光 前川浩树 等.溃疡性结肠炎的诊断标准与诊断进展[J].炎症性肠疾患胃与肠,1997,32(3):271-278.
  • 8八尾恒良.Crohn病的诊断标准与诊断进展[J].炎症性肠病疾患胃与肠,1997,32(3):317-326.
  • 9胡品津.炎症性肠病.见:叶任高,陆再英主编.内科学.第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.406-416.
  • 10欧阳钦.炎症性肠病的诊治进展.见:孟宪镛主编.实用消化病诊疗学.第2版.上海:世界图书出版社,2006.362-84.

共引文献427

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部