期刊文献+

Relative Feed Value of Different Varieties of Dactylis glomerata and Festuca pratensis 被引量:1

Relative Feed Value of Different Varieties of Dactylis glomerata and Festuca pratensis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The aim of this paper is to analyze fluctuation in nutritional value of Dactylis glomerata and Festuca pratensis varieties grown on mineral and organic soil. Moreover, the paper deals with analysis of their nutritional value in terms of animal feeding. This paper has drawn on two field experiments set up and carried out between 2010 and 2013 by the Research Centre for Cultivar Testing in Slupia Wielka. The experiment was conducted in two experimental stations: one in the Research Centre for Cultivar Testing in Krzyzewo and the other in the Experimental Stations for Variety Testing in Uhinin, being a branch of the Research Centre for Cultivar Testing in Cicibor Duzy. The experiment was arranged and conducted according to COBORU guidelines. The experimental plots were sown with varieties of Dactylis glornerata: Niva, Tukan, Amila, Crown Royale and with varieties of Festuca pratensis: Limosa, Pasja, Anturka, Amelka (d. AND 1009). In the experimental plots with the varieties of Dactylis glornerata the grass was harvested six times a year and chemical analysis of the biomass was done taking dry matter only from five cuts. The varieties of Festuca pratensis were harvested four times. The RFV (relative feed value) was determined using the Linn and Martin method. Linn and Martin's test proved that Festuca pratensis had better nutritional value than Dactylis glomerata. For Dactylis glomerata, no matter what the variety and location was, the relative feed value ranged from 125 to 151, which puts that grass species in II quality class, good enough to feed high production dairy cows and heirs selected for replacements. The analysis of the relative feed value proved that no matter from which cut, the biomass ofDactylis glornerata belonged in Ill quality class, (RFV between 103 and 124) and it can be used to feed good beef cattle, older heifers and, in small quantities, dairy cows.
出处 《Journal of Life Sciences》 2015年第9期443-448,共6页 生命科学(英文版)
关键词 Dry matter intake dry matter digestability relative feed value. 饲料相对值 品种试验 高羊茅 鸭茅 草地早熟禾 营养价值 田间试验 野生品种
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Jankowska-Huflejt H., and Wr6bel B. 2008. "Ocena Przydatnoci Pasz z Uzytk6w Zielonych do Produkcji Zwierzcej w Badanych Gospodarstwach Ekologicznych." J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng. 54 (3): 103-8.
  • 2Linn J. G., and Martin N. P. 1989. "Forage Quality Test and Interpretation." Univ. Minnesota.
  • 3Sosnowski J. 2012. "Wplyw U,yiniacza Glebowego Stosowanego w Uprawie Lolium perenne L., Dactylis glomerata L. i Festuca pratensis Huds. na Wzgldn Warto6 Pokarmowzt (RFV) Paszy." Fragm. Agron. 29 (3): 136-43.
  • 4Domafiski P. 1998. "Metodyka Badania WartociGospodarczej Odmian (WGO) Rolin Uprawnych." COBORU, Stupia Wielka., Wyd. I.
  • 5Radzka E. 2014. "Tendencje Zmian Temperatury Powietrza Okresu Wegetacyjnego w ;rodkowo-wschodniej Polsce ( 1971-2005)." A cta Agrophysica. 21 ( 1 ): 87-96.
  • 6Skowera B., and Pula J. 2004, "Skrajne Warunki Pluwiotermiczne w Okresie Wiosennym na Obszarze Polski w Latach 1971-2000." Acta Agrophysica. 3 (1): 171-7.
  • 7Hintz R. W., and Albrecht K. A. 1991. "Prediction of Alfalfa Chemical Composition from Maturity and Plant Morphology." Crop Sci. 31 : 1561-5.
  • 8Ward R. 2008. Relative Feed Value (RFV) vs. Relative Forage Oualitv (RFO).
  • 9Burns G. A., Gilliland T. J., Grogan D., and O'Kiely P. 2012. "Comparison of the Agronomic Effects of Maturity and Ploidy in Perennial Ryegrass." Grassland a European Resource? EGF, Grassland Sciences in Europe 17: 349-51.
  • 10Bodarski R., Krzywiecki S., Pre J., Kubizna J., and Witek D. 2012. "Relationships between Feed Composition Characteristics and Intake of Fresh and Ensiled Grass-legume Mixtures by Dairy Cows.'" Grassland a European Resource? EGF, Grassland Sciences in European 17: 341-2.

同被引文献16

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部