对国内仲裁裁决程序瑕疵的司法监督标准之实证研究

笔者以法院行使其对国内仲裁裁决司法监督权时,对《中华人民共和国仲裁法》（以下简称《仲裁法》）第58条第1款第3项（（1））的适用和认定标准为研究对象,以在我国众多仲裁机构中比较具有代表性的北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁中心（BAC/BIAC,以下简称北仲）,自1995年成立以来作出的仲裁裁决接受法院有关撤销仲裁裁决的司法监督的实践情况为研究蓝本,试图梳理和分析法院在对仲裁裁决的司法监督中对于＂仲裁庭的组成或仲裁的程序违反法定程序＂认定的态度和做法,希冀在现有法律框架下,为仲裁程序瑕疵的司法监督标准进行有益探索。

This paper focuses on the criteria provided in Article58. 1. 3 of China Arbitration Law（ hereinafter referred to as ＂Arbitration Law＂） the courts apply,when they practice judicial supervisions on the domestic arbitration awards. Based on the practice reality with respect to the arbitration awards that supervised by the courts, the author contemplates to systemize and analyze the courts＇ attitudes and methods of how they identify the violation of legal procedures related to composition of tribunal or arbitration procedures when they practice judicial supervisions on arbitration awards. The arbitration awards thereof are all from the Beijing Arbitration Commission / Beijing International Arbitration Center（ hereinafter referred to as ＂BAC /BIAC＂） as of 1995 when BAC / BIAC was established. BAC / BIAC is an arbitration commission which is typical among hundreds of the domestic arbitration commissions. Under the current legal framework,this paper hopes to contribute itself to the study of criteria of judicial supervisions on arbitration procedure flaws.