摘要
保证合同纠纷是否受主合同仲裁条款约束的问题在理论和实践中都存在着较大争议。当事人的意思自治、仲裁的书面形式、合同的相对性与仲裁协议的独立性、仲裁的保密性等理论否认了仲裁条款效力的扩张,而公平合理期待、援引并入原则、关联合同理论等理论则支持了仲裁条款效力扩张。域外司法实践也未达成统一的结论。应遵循现行法律的规定,对仲裁的书面形式与意思表示的存在两方面进行解释,避免矛盾裁判的出现。
There is a controversy lies in whether the dispute arises from Guarantee contract could be applicable to the Arbitration clause in Principal contract both in theory and practice. The applicable effect is denied by Doctrine of party autonomy, Written Form of Arbitration Clause, Relativity of Contract and Confidentiality in Arbitration.However,the Fair and Reasonable theory, Acquiescence in Citing Arbitration Clause and Related Agreement theory support the applicable effect of Arbitration Clause in principal contract. There is no real consensus in the dispute both inside an outside the nation. We should follow the law,interpret from the Written Form and the Intention of the Party,avoiding contradictive judgment.
出处
《北京仲裁》
2015年第4期34-54,共21页
Beijing Arbitration Quarterly
关键词
仲裁协议
意思表示
意思自治
公平合理
保证合同
主合同
arbitration clause
intention of party
autonomy of will
fair and reason
guarantee contract
principal contract