期刊文献+

区域交通运输业碳排放变化的驱动因素分解分析 被引量:11

Driving Factor Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions for Regional Transportation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为识别区域交通运输业碳排放驱动因素并测算其贡献率,作者将影响因素分为规模效应、结构效应和技术效应三方面。综合考虑经济产出、人口规模、运输结构、运输强度及能源效率等因素对区域交通运输业碳排放的影响,基于扩展的Kaya恒等式建立因素分解模型,应用对数平均迪氏分解法(LMDI)对区域交通运输业碳排放进行因素分解。研究结果表明:经济产出效应对区域交通运输业碳排放的贡献率最大,达到96.05%,其他各影响因素按贡献率绝对值大小依次是,运输结构效应为48.59%,运输强度效应为-30.46%,能耗效率效应为-15.88%,人口规模效应为1.59%。研究认为,目前交通运输业碳减排的重点在于调整运输结构、提高能耗效率和降低运输强度。针对实证结果,作者提出了相应的节能减排建议。 To identify the carbon emission driving factors of regional transportation and measure their corresponding contributions,this paper classified the factors into three kind effects, that is scale effect,structure effect and technique effect.A decomposition model based on the extended Kaya identity was established, and the impact of the economic scale, population size, transport structure, transport intensity and energy efficiency on carbon emission were examined in detail with the log mean decompostion index(LMDI)method. Empirical results demonstrated that the economic scale effect, whose contribution ratio reached 96.05%, played a dominant role in increasing carbon emission of regional transportation, followed by the transport structure effect, 48.59%, transport intensity effect,-30.46%, the energy efficiency effect,-15.88%, the population size effect,1.59%. The study suggests that the current policies about energy-saving and emission- reduction of transportation industry should focus on regulating transport structure, improving energy efficiency and reducing transport intensity. Appropriate energy conservation policy recommendations were put forward according the empirical results.
出处 《交通运输工程与信息学报》 2016年第2期56-62,共7页 Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information
关键词 综合交通运输 驱动因素 对数平均迪氏指数法 交通运输碳排放 Kaya恒等式 Integrated transportation factor decomposition LMDI method transport emissions Kaya identity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1丁金学.我国交通运输业碳排放及其减排潜力分析[J].综合运输,2012,34(12):20-26. 被引量:33
  • 2Kaya Y. Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios JR] Paris: IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, 1990.
  • 3Han J., Hayashi Y. A system dynamics model of C02 mitigation in China's inter-city passenger transport [J]. Transportation research part D, 2008, (13):298-305.
  • 4Wang W.W., Zhang M., Zhou M. Using LMDI method to analyze transport sector CO2 emissions in China [J]. Energy, 2011, (36): 5909-5915.
  • 5LOO B., LI L. Carbon dioxide emissions from passenger transport in China since 1949: Implications for developing sustainable transport [J]. Energy Policy,2012, (50) :464-476.
  • 6沈满洪,池熊伟.中国交通部门碳排放增长的驱动因素分析[J].江淮论坛,2012(1):31-38. 被引量:21
  • 7Ang B. W. Decomposition analysis for policy making in energy : which is the preferred method? [J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32(9): 1131-1139.
  • 8刘建翠.中国交通运输部门节能潜力和碳排放预测[J].资源科学,2011,33(4):640-646. 被引量:89
  • 9IPCC. 2006 1PCC guidelines for national greetlhollse gas inventories : volume II [ES/OL]. Japan: the Institute for Global Eavitcmkntal Strategies, 2008. http: //www.ipcc.ch/ipccmportd/ Methodology- rtports.htm [2008-17-20].

二级参考文献12

共引文献128

同被引文献143

引证文献11

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部