摘要
迟延裁判直接贬损法院的社会形象,进而影响司法公信力。民事诉讼审限制度的主要目的是解决法院迟延裁判问题。由于审限制度以司法行政化为作用机制,忽视了民事诉讼的客观规律,在实践中催生出各种规避措施以及牺牲当事人程序权利的异化现象。只有以符合民事诉讼客观规律的迟延裁判应对措施逐步替代民事诉讼审限制度,在民事诉讼框架内为当事人开启有效的程序权利保障途径,并针对迟延裁判可能产生的实体损害提供有效补偿机制,才可能妥善并根本上解决迟延裁判问题。
The overdue judgment does harm to the public image of courts directly,which thereby causes bad influence on the court's credibility. The main purpose of trial period in civil procedure is to solve overdue judgment problems. As the trial period functions by judicial administration,there are kinds of circumvention and prejudice to parties' procedural rights. To solve this issue properly and fundamentally,The trial period system should be replaced by countermeasures in accord with objective law in civil litigation gradually,a new way of procedural rights protection should be open, and effective compensation for the damages that may occurred by overdue judgment should be offered.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期145-155,176,共11页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
清华大学郑裕彤法学发展基金资助
教育部留学归国人员科研启动基金项目"民事诉讼目的与民事诉讼结构调整"(20141020048)的阶段性成果
关键词
诉讼迟延
迟延裁判
审限制度
迟延异议
损害赔偿
Overdue Litigation
Overdue Judgment
System of Trial Period
Protest against Long Duration
Compensation for Damages