“贸易促进权”之争及其对美国贸易政策的影响被引量：5

Debates on the Trade Promotion Authority and Their Impact on U.S. Trade Policy

导出

摘要 "贸易促进权"体现了美国总统与国会之间的宪法权力关系,是理解美国贸易政策的形成与演变的一把钥匙。过去几年中,围绕"贸易促进权",美国国内各种力量,包括行政部门、国会和各种利益集团等,就行政部门与立法部门之间的宪法权力关系、自由贸易协定谈判的透明度、汇率操纵、劳工标准、环境保护、公平竞争、就业与福利、全球贸易规则制定及美国的全球领导地位等议题展开了激烈的争论。这些争论影响了2015年"贸易促进权"法案的内容,也影响了"跨太平洋伙伴关系协定"和"跨大西洋贸易与投资伙伴关系协定"等贸易协定的谈判进程,并对这些协定未来的批约过程产生影响。 The Trade Promotion Authority( TPA) shows the relationship of constitutional powers between the US President and the Congress and is a key to understanding the making and evolvement of US trade policy. In the last few years,debates on TPA,including specific issues,such as the constitutional powers of the President and the Congress,transparency in free trade agreement negotiations,currency manipulations,labor standards,environmental protection,fair competition,employment and welfare,global trade rules,and US global leadership,went on heatedly among the administration,and the Congress,as well as many related interest groups. These debates have exerted great influence on the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015( especially on its content and passage in the Congress) and the negotiation procedures of the Trans-Pacific Partnership( TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership( TTIP),and will also influence their coming approval procedures in the Congress. By clarifying these debates we can see better the future directions of U. S. trade policy.

作者仇朝兵

机构地区中国社会科学院美国研究所

出处《美国研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期35-60,6,共26页 The Chinese Journal of American Studies

关键词美国经济贸易政策“贸易促进权”“跨太平洋伙伴关系协定”

分类号 D971.2 [政治法律—法学] DD912.29 [政治法律]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献72

1金灿荣.国会与美国贸易政策的制定——历史和现实的考察[J].美国研究,2000,14(2):7-30. 被引量：30
2林玲,李江冰.《布什政府的贸易促进权之争》,载《美国新经济周期与中美经贸关系——全国美国经济学会第七届年会论文集》(2003年),第156-164页.
3孙哲,李巍.美国贸易代表办公室与美国国际贸易政策[J].美国研究,2007,21(1):85-106. 被引量：19
4李莉文.美国“快车道”授权探析[J].国际论坛,2011,13(3):71-74. 被引量：3
5《美国宪法及其修正案》(朱曾汶译),北京·商务印书馆,2015年版,第4-9页.
6Curtis A. Bradley, "Federalism and the Treaty Power, "Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ( American Society of In- ternational Law), Vol. 98 ( March 31 - April 3, 2004) , pp. 341 -343.
7Douglas A. Irwin, "From Smoot-Hawley to Reciprocal Trade Agreements : Changing the Course of U. S. Trade Poli- cy in the 1930 " in Michael D. Bordo, Claudia Goldin & Eugene N. White, The Defining Moment: The Great De- pression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century( Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1998 ), pp. 327 - 329.
8Paola Conconi, Giovanni Facchini & Maurizio Zanardi, "Fast Track Authority and International Trade Negotia- tions," May 2011, available at: http ://www. ecares, org/ecare/personal/conconi $/web/FTA. pdf, p. 4.
9David A. Lake, "International Economic Structures and American Foreign Economic Policy, 1887 -1934," World Politics, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Jul. , 1983), p.538.
10David E. Birenbaum, "The Omnibus Trade Act of 1988 : Trade Law Dialectics," University of Pennsylvania Journal oflnternational Law,Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 655-656.

二级参考文献83

1盛斌.世界经济转变中的美国对外贸易政策[J].美国研究,1998,12(3):30-49. 被引量：16
2杨树明,陈功.美国对外贸易法中“贸易促进权”模式探析[J].中山大学学报（社会科学版）,2005,45(5):37-41. 被引量：9
3Todd Tucker, Lori Wallach, The Rise and Fall of Fast Track Trade Authority, Washington, D. C. : Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, 2008, p. 42.
4Victor A. Canto, "U. S. Trade Policy: History and Evidence", Cato Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, Winter 1983/84, p. 682.
5Delia B. Conti, Reconciling Free Trade, Fair Trade, and Interdependence: The Rhetoric of Presidential Economic Leadership, Westport, CT.. Praeger, 1998, p.61, p. 59.
6Kevin Kennedy, "GATT 1994", in Patrick F. J. ,Arthur Ed- mond Appleton, and Michael G. Plummer, eds. , The World Trade Organization : Legal, Economic, and Political Analysis, Vol. 1, New York: Springer Science and Business Media, Inc. , 2005, p. 94.
7Hobart Rowen, "23 Countries Agree to Ease Trade Limits; U. S., 22 Others Agree to Ease Nantariff Trade Barriers", Washington Post, 13 Apr. 1979, final ed., sec. A: A1.
8Jasmine Farrier, Congressional Ambivalence : The Political Burdens of Constitutional Authority, Lexington: The University Press o f Kentucky, 2010, p. 91.
9Harold Hongju Koh, " The Fast Track and United States Trade Policy", Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1992, pp. 148-149, p. 151.
10Carter Dougherty,"House Approves 'Fast-Track' Measure; Trade Bill Passes By Just One Vote", Washington Times, 7 Dec. 2001, final ed., sec. A: A1.