期刊文献+

多西他赛联合希罗达治疗转移性乳腺癌的临床观察 被引量:7

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究多西他赛联合希罗达治疗转移性乳腺癌的治疗效果和不良反应。方法选取60例转移性乳腺癌患者,随机分为2组,各30例。观察组采用多西他赛联合希罗达治疗,对照组采用多西他赛单药治疗。评价2组患者治疗疗效,记录不良反应。结果观察者总有效率(CR+PR)为60.0%、肿瘤控制率(CR+PR+SD)为86.7%;对照组总有效率(CR+PR)为33.3%、肿瘤控制率(CR+PR+SD)为70.0%;观察组疗效明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者常见的不良反应中手足综合征明显少于对照组(χ2=4.6296,P=0.0314),其余指标与对照组比较差异无统计学意义。结论多西他赛联合希罗达治疗转移性乳腺癌比单药治疗效果更佳,值得临床推广。 Objective To study Xeloda combined with docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer therapeutic effect and adverse reactions. Methods 60 patients with metastatic breast cancer patients were randomly divided into two groups, the observation group, 30 patients were treated with Xeloda combined with docetaxel therapy, the control group, more docetaxel monotherapy. Evaluation of efficacy, adverse reactions recorded. Results Observer total efficiency (CR + PR) was 60.0% tumor control rate (CR + PR + SD) was 86.7%, significantly higher overall response rate (CR + PR) 33.3%, tumor control rate ( (CR + PR + SD) 70.0%, a statistically significant difference (P〈0.05); observation group common adversed reactions in hand-foot syndrome was significantly less than control group (Х^2=4.6296, P=-0.0314), with the remaining indicators in the control group the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Xeloda combined with docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer better, worthy of promotion.
作者 邹菁帆
出处 《当代医学》 2016年第14期133-134,共2页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 多西他赛 希罗达 转移性乳腺癌 Docetaxel Xeloda Metastatic breast cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献37

  • 1梁翠微,杨兵,李小亮,孙达春.泰素帝联合希罗达治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床观察[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2005,17(6):405-406. 被引量:8
  • 2江泽飞,宋三泰,徐建明,刘晓晴,李彦博,赵平瑜.单用去甲长春花碱治疗复发转移乳癌[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18(3):208-210. 被引量:45
  • 3[1]Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Fukase Y, et al. Induction of thymidine phosphorylase activity and enhancement of capecitabine efiicacy by taxol/taxotere in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res, 1998, 4 (4) :1013
  • 4[2]Tsuchida Y, Therasse P. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): New guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol, 2001,37 (1) :1
  • 5[4]Jones S, Erban J, Overmoyer B, et al. Randomized trial comparing docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The 26th Annual SanAntonio Breast Cancer Symposium,2003 (abstract 10)
  • 6[6]Schuller J, Cassidy J, Dumont E, et al. Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 2000, 45(4):291
  • 7[8]George W Sledge, Donna Neuberg, Patricia Bemardo, et al.Phase Ⅲ trial of doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel as front- line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: An Intergroup Trial (El193). J Clin Oncol, 2003, 21 (4) :588
  • 8[9]Alba E, Martin M, Ramos M, et al. Multicenter phase randomized trial comparing sequential versus concomitant administration of doxorubicin (A) and docetaxel (T) as first- line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). GEICAM 9903 Study.ASCO, 2003, 22: 8 (abstract 27)
  • 9[10]O'Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Vukelja S, et al. Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer:Phase Ⅲ trial results. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20 (12) :2812
  • 10[11]London Susan Mayor. NICE recommends new treatment for breast and bowel cancer. BMJ, 2003, 326:1166

共引文献170

同被引文献39

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部