摘要
电子数据被《民事诉讼法》确定为法定证据形式,从立法层面上获得独立价值,而电子数据证据举证形式多样化与复杂化,将是法官在实务中将面对的问题。电子数据举证形式类型分为:直接打印输出件、公证文书、录音录像、当事人事前确认。对于电子数据的认证,法官应与具体案由相结合,肯定直接打印输出件的价值,不盲目依赖公证文书,必要时对电子数据进行鉴定。在现有立法情况下,最高人民法院可及时推出指导性案例,回应司法实践中的认证疑点。各地高院可根据地区案件情况,出台有针对性的问题解答,破解司法实践中的认证难题。
The electronic data became the legal evidence in Civil Procedure Law,which obtained an independent legislative level value,while the form of evidences is diverse and complex,and there are problems faced by judges in practice. The form of electronic data types into direct printouts,notary documents,audio and video recording,the parties confirm beforehand. For certification of electronic data judges should be combined with the specific cause of action,Judges should affirm the value of the output member directly print,should not blindly rely notarized documents and identified electronic data when necessary. Under existing legislation,the Supreme Court should timely make introduction of guiding case to respond judicial practice certification doubts. High Court should make the introduction of targeted questions over the circumstances of the case according to region to crack judicial practice certification problems.
出处
《齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2016年第5期68-72,共5页
Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
电子数据
证据
举证形式
认证
electronic data
evidence
the form of electronic data
evidence identified