摘要
抽象危险犯的立法目的在于应对以实害犯和具体危险犯均难以解决的疑难问题。抽象危险犯所产生的危险系行为的危险,其蕴含于行为之中。因此,对抽象危险犯的危险不能允许反证。在我国立法定量模式下应对犯罪构成作实质解释。抽象危险犯蕴含着侵犯人权的风险,需要对其成立范围予以合理限制。在承认行为实施之后危险必然存在的前提下,可以通过对犯罪构成要件进行实质解释限制抽象危险犯的成立范围,这是确保其司法正当性的最为现实的路径。
The legislative purpose of the abstract dangerous offence is to deal withthe problems which are difficult to be solved in the legislative modes of the actual damageoffense and concrete dangerous offence. The danger of the abstract dangerous offence is that of the act,and is contained in the act. Therefore,the danger of the abstract dangerousoffence is not allowed to prove its non- existence once the act is perpetrated. As far as the constitution of a crime is concerned,under the legislative quantitative mode,the substantive interpretation should be carried out. The danger of infringing upon the human rights iscontained in the abstract dangerous offence. Therefore,reasonable limitations are needed to impose on its punishment scope. Under the precondition of admitting the danger is destined to exist once the act is perpetrated,the substantive interpretation over the constitutive elements can be adopted to limit the punishment scope of the abstract dangerous offence,which is the most realistic way to ensure the judicial correctness.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期72-82,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
抽象危险犯
实质解释
危险
但书
abstract dangerous offence
substantive interpretation
danger
proviso