期刊文献+

论民事诉讼登记立案的文本之“困”与实践之“繁” 被引量:9

The Research on How Dilemma in Legal document and Complicated in practice of the Registration filing system
原文传递
导出
摘要 登记立案旨在保障当事人诉权,但最高法院《民诉解释》及随后出台的规范性文件中尽管将登记立案文本化,但在文本逻辑与审查内容等方面存在多重困境。实践中法院纠结于立案改革的推动和法律文本间的矛盾采取了繁复的应对策略,以登记收案缓解登记立案的困境,将可能出现的"起诉难"通过分解细化的程序与充分的释明告知,转化为当事人不听告知、不为补正的自负其责,当事人在立案程序中依然隐形失语。登记立案使业务庭功能分区被打破,重复性审查带来效率的降低与矛盾的凸显。通过简化起诉要件规范诉状内容、重构立案与审判的"二元"关系、以听审权保障为核心改造诉讼要件审查程序为我国登记立案改革的当前困境寻找适宜的"解困"之路。 The registration filing system plays an aim at guaranteeing the right of action. Although the Supreme Court published " Interpretation of Civil procedure Law" and other documents to realize the textualization of the registration filing system,there still exists dilemmas on textual logics and examination contents. In actual work the court uses complex coping strategies to deal with contradictions between the impetus of legislation reform and legal texts: using the registration of accepting cases to relieve the dilemma of the registration filing system and converting the possible difficulties in bringing a lawsuit with the help of detailed procedures and fully explanation to the self- responsibility,while the parties hidden in the process of case filing procedure. The Registration filing system breaks the sectorization of the court and the repetitive investigation leads to the lower efficiency and contradiction. A suitable path of the Registration filing system's future development can be found through definituding the scope of the case and competent court dispute adjudication mechanism,simplifying the requirements specification prosecution petition content,transforming the examination procedure of essential requisite by using the protection of the core elements.
作者 曲昇霞
机构地区 扬州大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期155-163,共9页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金 国家社科基金重大招标项目(10ZD8c043)"维护司法公正和社会公平正义研究" 扬州大学人文社科研究基金项目(xjj2014-23)
关键词 登记立案 文本 实践 困境 裁判请求权 the Registration filing system Legal document Judicial practice Dilemma the right of access to justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1http://ww-a.1ive.chinacou.org/chat/chat/2015/11/id/42903.shtml,访问时间2015/12/9.
  • 2自助立案.http://www.shzgh.org/node2/pudong/node2882/ulai778372.html,2015-9-7.
  • 3朱曼:《江苏法院网上立案流程简数量升》,《人民法院报))2015-9-17第01版.
  • 4http://www.1ive.chinacourt.0rg/chat/chat/2015/11/id/42903.shtml,访问时间2015/12/9.
  • 5李娜:《立案登记制深远影响司法改革法学专家称须正确理解防误读》,《法制日报》4月17日第5版.
  • 6《上海高院回应赵薇被诉"瞪眼":不予立案》,http://www.chi-nadaily.coin.cn/hqej/xfly/2015-06-11/content-13829861.html.2015-9-7.
  • 7李娜、李豪:《立案登记首月民告官案爆棚认识有误诉由林林总总》,《法制日报》,2015-6-5(05).
  • 8邓双飞:《原告不缴纳诉讼费法院裁定按撤诉处理》,http://1wfy.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id:5342015-9-13.
  • 9张卫平.民事案件受理制度的反思与重构[J].法商研究,2015,32(3):3-15. 被引量:116
  • 10傅郁林.中国民事诉讼立案程序的功能与结构[J].法学家,2011(1):99-113. 被引量:59

二级参考文献146

共引文献422

同被引文献91

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部