摘要
目的应用响应曲面法分析术后镇痛药地佐辛和凯纷互作用模型,获得最佳的有效镇痛浓度,达到良好的镇痛效果和更少的副作用发生。方法选择ASAI-II级拟行术后镇痛的手术患者90例,年龄18到60岁,随机分为低浓度组、高浓度组和响应曲面组。低浓度组静脉PCA药物浓度为地佐辛25mg+凯纷150mg+生理盐水到250ml,高浓度组PCA药物浓度为地佐辛50mg+凯纷250mg+生理盐水到250ml,响应曲面组应用响应曲面分析法得出地佐辛与凯纷相互作用模型,获得理想的药物配置浓度,与高低浓度组进行镇痛效果效果与副作用发生率的比较。结果通过响应曲面分析获得的地佐辛和凯纷镇痛浓度方案,镇痛效果与高浓度配比方案没有统计学差异优于低浓度组方案,恶心呕吐、头晕的发生率低于高浓度组有统计学意义。结论应用响应曲面法可以获得两种药物术后镇痛最佳配比,获得良好的镇痛,降低副作用的发生。
Objective Response surface analysis was applied to describe the pharmacodynamic interactions between dezocine and flurbiprofen in postoperative analgesia to get a better analgesic effect,and have less side-effects.Methods90 surgical patients,ASA I-II,aged 18 to 60,who undertook operation and postoperative analgesia,were randomly divided into experimental group,low-dose group and high-dose group.The low-dose group was given intravenous postoperative analgesia pump:dezocine 25mg+flurbiprofen 150 mg dissolved to 250 ml 0.9%saline,the high-dose group was given intravenous postoperative analgesia pump:dezocine 50mg+flurbiprofen 250 mg dissolved to 250 ml 0.9% saline and the experimental group was given a ideal scheme which obtained through the response surface model of dezocine and flurbiprofen,then the analgesic effect and the incidence of side-effects were compared.Results Compared with conventional schemes,the experimental group has no statistical differences in analgesic effect,but has lower incidence of nausea,vomiting and dizziness than the high-dose group.Conclusion The application of response surface analysis can analyze the interactions of drugs and reach an ideal scheme,which may obtain better analgesic effect and less adverse events.
出处
《中国实验诊断学》
2016年第5期726-729,共4页
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis
关键词
术后镇痛
地佐辛
凯纷
响应曲面
不良反应
Dezocine
Flurbiprofen
postoperative analgesia
response surface
side effects