期刊文献+

护-护合作量表在我国护士中的普适性研究 被引量:4

Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价中文版护-护合作量表(nurse-nurse collaboration scale,NNCS)在我国护士中的心理测量学属性。方法将NNCS进行翻译、回译和跨文化调适后形成中文版,对合肥三所医院的574名护士进行调查,利用SPSS 13.0和AMOS 17.0统计软件进行分析,形成最终量表。结果经分析删选后,中文版NNCS共25个条目,4个维度,总量表Cronbach’sα系数为0.93,平均内容效度为0.98。提取的4个因子累积贡献率达57.97%;一阶和二阶验证性因子分析显示:X^2/df=2.33/2.55,GFI=0.92/0.92,AGFI=0.90/0.90,RMSEA=0.05/0.05,RMR=0.02/0.05,NFI=0.93/0.92,CFI=0.96/0.95,TLI=0.95/0.94。结论中文版NNCS可作为护-护合作水平的有效评估工具。 Objective To explore the universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses.Methods The NNCS was translated according to Brislin principle and adapted according to Chinese culture. The universality of Chinese version of NNCS was tested among 574 clinical nurses in Hefei city. SPSS 13. 0 software and AMOS 17. 0software were used to analyze data and then final Chinese version of NNCS was formed. Results The Chinese version of NNCS was consisted of 25 items in 4 dimensions. The Cronbach's α for the over scale was 0. 93 and the content validity index was 0. 98. Four factors were extracted which contributed 57. 97% of the total variance. First-confirmatory factor analysis and second-confirmatory factor analysis showed: χ^/ df = 2. 33 /2. 55,GFI = 0. 92 /0. 92,AGFI = 0. 90 /0. 90,RMSEA= 0. 05 /0. 05,RMR = 0. 02 /0. 05,NFI = 0. 93 /0. 92,CFI = 0. 96 /0. 95,TLI = 0. 95 /0. 94. Conclusions The Chinese version of NNCS is reliable and valid,and can be used to assess the status of collaboration among clinical nurses in China.
出处 《中华疾病控制杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期508-511,共4页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention
基金 安徽省教育厅质量工程项目(2014msgzs137) 安徽省科技厅项目(1303063025)
关键词 护士 问卷调查 评价研究 主题 Nurses Questionnaires Evaluation studies as topic
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献55

共引文献253

同被引文献38

  • 1解业达,段海军.主观幸福感研究进展[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,33(5):121-124. 被引量:14
  • 2合作.[2015-06-27].http://baike.baidu.com/link?ufl=ZNVcCFOTv4lvJiKVzl7njJ7ED000RddNwl--Sg07BPYt57yvR8VWObYRObgc-OYdTOr-wn0IfrcPFeyI1K39hTRJ0mhYFDQ815g8s0wMNkm.
  • 3Diener E, Eunkook MS, Richard EL, et al. Subjective wellbeing three dacades of progress. Psychol Bull, 1999,125(2):276-302.
  • 4Chang WY, Ma JC, Chiu HT, et al. Job satisfaction and perceptions of quality of patient care, collaboration and teamwork in acute care hospitals. J Adv Nurs, 2009, 65(9): 1946-1955.
  • 5Dougherty MB, Larson EL. The nurse-nurse collaboration scale. J Nurs Adm, 2010,40(1):17-25.
  • 6Fredricson BL, Branigon C. Positive emotions broden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 2005,19(3): 313-332.
  • 7Mitchell RR, Friedman HS. Sandplay: past, present and future. London: Routledge, 1994.
  • 8王兆霞,沈丽,张东宁,贾丽华.科室管理中促进护士间合作方法的探讨[J].护理管理杂志,2011,11(1):72-73. 被引量:7
  • 9卢立锦.合作性学习对低年资护士工作满意度的影响[J].全科护理,2011,9(5):435-436. 被引量:7
  • 10张小兰,巫江丽,沈小华.护士主观幸福感提升策略研究[J].护士进修杂志,2014,29(6):509-512. 被引量:6

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部