王铭铭的“天下观”研究历程与评论被引量：1

Comments on Wang Mingming's Research of the World View

导出

摘要在弗里德曼和施坚雅提出社会科学与汉学结合之后,中国人类学进入一个超越社区研究的时代。这方面以王铭铭为代表,他以对弗里德曼和施坚雅的继承和反思为主体,直到最后形成自己对民间宗教的系统看法。作者在对"朝圣"概念的文化翻译中获得了接轨的动力,更确切地说,作者找到了"象征一体性"的中国语境。从天下观到"三圈说",再到天才观,作者行走于乡土上,感受的却是离乡土愈来愈远的历史、人物和文明,从这里开始,作者开启了一种化历史为人类学的象征·符号的思考。 After Friedman and Skinner proposed to integrate sociology with Sinology, Chinese anthropology entered a time of studies beyond communities represented by Wang Mingming. Wang inherited and reflected on Friedman and Skinner＇s theory and finally formed his systematic view on folk religion. After observing ritual ceremonies and theoretical twists and turns,he obtained the motivation of integration from cultural translation of ＂ pilgrimage＂,or more exactly,he found the Chinese context of ＂ symbolic unity＂.From the world view to the theory of three rings and then to the world view again,while investigating in the countryside,he started to gain insights of history,characters and civilization beyond the countryside. Finally,he started to ponder upon history as anthropological symbols.

作者马丹丹

机构地区上海大学社会学院

出处《中央民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期18-29,共12页 Journal of Minzu University of China(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基金国家社会科学基金"学科重建以来的中国民族志实践与书写研究"(课题编号:14CSH074)的阶段性成果

关键词朝圣天下观三圈说历史想象力 pilgrimage world view the theory of three rings historical imagination

分类号 C912 [经济管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1王铭铭.从礼仪看中国式社会理论[A].经验与心态[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2007.
2王铭铭."朝圣"-历史中的文化翻译[A].王铭铭.走在乡土上-历史人类学札记[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
3王铭铭.知识分子与"远方之见"[A].王铭铭.经验与心态-历史,世界想象与社会[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2007:380.
4费孝通.重读《江村经济·序言》[J].北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）,1996,33(4):4-18. 被引量：120
5王铭铭.何为艺术的社会性[A].王铭铭.经验与心态-历史,世界想象与社会[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社.2007:287.
6王铭铭.现代性与我们的生活世界[A].王铭铭.没有后门的教室-人类学随谈感录[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社.2006:56.
7费孝通.重读《江村经济序言》,1996年3月25日.
8罗伯特·雷德菲尔德.从事耕种的农民们[A].罗伯特·雷德菲尔德.农民社会与文化-人类学对文明的一种阐释[C].王莹译,中国社会科学出版社,2013:59,84-89.
9王铭铭.权威的形象与生活史-闽台两村案例初探[A].王铭铭,潘忠党主编.象征与社会-中国民间文化的探讨[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1997:371-374.
10《经验与心态》,第224页.

二级参考文献50

1Steven Harrell.The anthropology of reform and the reform of anthropology:anthropological narratives of recovery and progress in China[J].Annual Review of Anthropology,30(1):39-61.
2Wang Mingming.Anthropology in China's Mainland in the Past Decade[J].Asian Anthropology,2005,(4):179-198.
3Johannes Fabian.Time and the Other[M].New York,1983.
4George Marcus,Michael Fischer.Anthropology as Cultural Critique[M].Chicago,1986.
5Li,An Che,Zuni.Some observations and queries[J].American Anthropologist,39(1):62-67.
6Maurice Freedman.The Study of Chinese Society[M].Stanford,1979.
7Francis Hsu,Clan,Caste,Club.A Comparative Study of Chinese,Hindu,and American Ways of Life[M].Princeton,1963.
8杨圣敏潘乃谷王铭铭.研究部之灵[A].潘乃谷,王铭铭.重归“魁阁”[C].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2005.116-130.
9Louisa Schien,Minority Rules.The Miao and the Feminine in China's Cultural Politics[M].Durham,1999.
10Jing,Jun.The Temple of Memories:History,Power,and Morality in a Chinese Village[M].Stanford,1996.