期刊文献+

自贸园区的国际法律规制与中国自贸试验区的应对——以贸易公平为视角 被引量:1

International Regulation of Free Trade Zone and Response of China Pilot Free Trade Zones: Perspective of Fair Trade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上海、广东、天津和福建自由贸易试验区(以下简称"自贸试验区")的管理行为的国际法效果归于中国政府,因此其制度创新需建立在国际合法性的基础之上。就发达国家关注的贸易政策合规、知识产权保护和"社会倾销"等涉及贸易公平的问题,四大自贸试验区需要在内化实施《补贴与反补贴协定》《与贸易有关的投资措施协定》及《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》方面充当表率,在强化知识产权的边境保护发挥引领作用。自贸试验区有必要在加强劳动标准的实施方面有所创新,以消除国际社会对中国所谓的"社会倾销"的顾虑。同时,基于大陆和台湾同为WTO成员的事实,福建自贸试验区推进两岸深度合作的相关立法作为国内安排,需注意不违反WTO的非歧视规则,避开贸易方面的特别优惠。 The legal effect of trade measures in China Pilot Free Trade Zones of Shanghai,Guangdong,Tianjin and Fujian attribute to central government of China. Considering the typical concerns of developed countries,i. e. concerns on legality of trade policy,intellectual property protection, 'social dumping',these pilot zones shall set good examples of compliance of typical international rules of fair trade,i. e.,Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures,Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures,Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. It is necessary for these pilot zones to take a lead in higher level of intellectual property protection including border measures. And it is also necessary for these pilot zones to make innovation on more effective implementation of labor standard. Based on the fact that Taiwan is also a member of WTO,Fujian Pilot Free Trade Zone shall ensure international legitimacy of relevant Cross-strait cooperation arrangements; the relevant special incentive shall not focus on trade,but on investment.
作者 郑丽珍
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期1-8,166,共8页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金 福建省教育厅课题"自贸园区的国际法律规制与福建自贸试验区的应对策略"(编号JAS150205)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1William G.Kanellis,Reining in the Foreign Trade Zones Board:Making Foreign Trade Zone Decisions Reflect the Legislative Intent of the Foreign Trade Zones Act of 1934,Northwestern Journal of International Law&Business,1995,Vol.15,p.606.
  • 2International Labour Office,Your Voice At Work,Geneva:ILO Publication,2000.
  • 3Trade Policy Review:Brazi(2013),at https://www.wto.org/english/tratop-e/tpr-e/s283-e.pdf.
  • 4Trade Policy Review:China(2014),last visited Jun.20,2015.
  • 5https://www.wto.org/english/tratop-e/tpr-e/tp400-e.htm,last visited Jun.20,2015.
  • 6Minutes of the meeting at https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE-Search/FE-S-S006.aspx?Query=(@Symbol=%20wt/tpr/m/300/add*)&Language=ENGLISH&Context=FomerS cripted Search&languageU IChanged=true#,last visited Jun.20,2015.
  • 7Sherzod Shadikhodjaev,International Regulation of Free Zones:An Analysis of Multilateral Customs and Trade Rules,World Trade Review,2011,Vol.10,No.2,p.195.
  • 8Frank Long,Employment Effects of Multinational Enterprises in Export Processing Zones in the Caribbean,ILO Publication,1986.
  • 9Office of the US Trade Representative.2015 Trade Policy Agenda,pp.7,24.
  • 10U.S.and Chinese delegations conclude the 26th session of the U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade,at https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/november/us-and-chinese-delegations,last visited Dec.8,2015.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部