期刊文献+

国际生产分工、环境规治与中国工业污染:——基于联立方程模型GMM估计方法的经验研究 被引量:1

International Production Specialization,Environmental Governance and Industrial Pollution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于环境政策内生模型,建立联立方程模型,应用GMM估算方法,以二氧化硫排放量作为环境指标,就国际分工、环境规治对我国工业污染的影响进行了实证研究。研究结果表明国际生产分工有助于清洁生产技术在我国的推广使用,从而技术效应对于减少二氧化硫的排放量有积极作用。同时,国际生产分工使得我国产业结构陷入低端过度制造业的陷阱,从而促进了我国二氧化硫排放量的增加。我国环境管理机构采取的税收政策和污染治理措施,都有助于我国二氧化硫排放量的减少,由于排污费过低,未能有效增加排污成本,使得污染治理效应高于环境税收效应。因此,促进产业服务业化,提高在国际生产分工地位,加强排污税收力度,是减少我国工业污染的关键。 Based on environmental policy Endogenous model,Taken sulfur dioxide emissions as environmental indicators, This paper has established simultaneous equations model,applied GMM estimation method to make a empirical study of international production specialization environmental regulations governing on the impact of industrial pollution.The results show that international production specialization helps to promote the use of cleaner production technologies in China,so that technical effect is positive in reducing sulfur dioxide emissions.Meanwhile,the international production specialization induced China's industrial structure into the trap of low-end excessive-manufacturing, which increase China's sulfur dioxide emissions. Tax policies and pollution control measures taken by China's environmental management agency,will help to reduce the amount of sulfur dioxide emissions.As sewage charges has failed to increase the sewage costs effectively,the effects of pollution investment is more obvious than that of pollution tax. Therefore,developing industrial services, promoting the status in international production specialization, raising sewage tax, is the key to reduce China's industrial pollution.
出处 《西北人口》 CSSCI 2016年第3期14-20,共7页 Northwest Population Journal
基金 国家社会科学基金西部项目<全球价值链下中国企业突破低端锁定的策略研究>(项目批准号:13XJL005) 重庆科技学院博士科研启动基金项目<新型工业化指标的构建与测算>的资助
关键词 产品内国际生产分工 环境税收效应 污染治理效应 intra-product international production specialization environment tax effect pollution investment effec
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Matthew A.Blackhuest. Do Environmental Regulations Influ- ence Trade Patterns? Testing Old and New Trade Theories[J]. Ecological Economics, 1977 (25) : 195-208.
  • 2Grnbel. Elliot. "Factor Endowments or Environmental Regu- lations?Determining the Trade-Environment Composition Ef-feet," J. Environment. Econ. Manage. ,forthcoming, 1975.
  • 3John, Koop. 1979. "An Overlapping Generations Model of Growth and the Environment," Econ. J. 104:427,pp.1393- 410.
  • 4Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman. 1991.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.--. 1994."Protection for Sale,"Amer. Econ. Rev.84:4, pp. 833-50.
  • 5Birdsall,Nancy and David Wheeler. 1992. "Trade Policy and Industrial Pollution in Latin America: Where Are the Pollution Havens?" in International Trade and the Environment. Patrick Low, ed. World Bank discuss, paper 159. Washington,DC: World Bank, pp. 159-67.
  • 6Grossman,Gene M. and Alan B. Krueger. 1993. "Environ- mental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, " in The U.S.-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. Peter M. Garber, ed. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, pp. 13-56;1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," Quart. J. Econ. 110:2, pp. 353-77.
  • 7Becker, Randy and Vernon Henderson. 2000. "Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries,"J. Polit. Econ. 108:2, pp. 379-421.
  • 8Gulati, Sumeet. 2001. "The Relationship between Interna- tional Trade And Environmental Regulation under Special In- terest Politics," J.Econ. Lit. 33:1, pp. 132-63.
  • 9Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor..Trade, Growth, and the Environment.Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XLII (March 2004) :7-71.
  • 10Antweiler, Werner; Brian R. Copeland and M. Scott Taylor.2001. "Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?" Amer. Econ. Rev. 91:4, pp. 877-908.

二级参考文献77

共引文献324

同被引文献24

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部