期刊文献+

基于深度学习的无参考立体图像质量评价 被引量:19

Blind Image Quality Assessment for Stereoscopic Images via Deep Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 立体图像质量评价是评价立体视频系统性能的有效途径,而如何结合人类的视觉特性对立体图像质量进行评价是目前的研究难点.为此提出一种基于深度学习的无参考立体图像质量评价方法,分为训练和测试2个阶段.在训练阶段,首先对左右图像分别进行Gabor滤波,获取不同尺度和方向的统计特征作为单目特性;然后根据人眼视觉系统的双目竞争特性,将左右图像融合得到独眼图,提取其方向梯度直方图作为双目特征;最后通过深度信念网络训练得到特征和主观评价值之间的回归模型.在测试阶段,根据已建立的回归模型,预测得到左右图像质量并联合得到立体图像质量.实验结果表明,文中方法在对称和非对称立体图像数据库都取得了较好的效果,与人类的主观感知保持良好的一致性. Stereoscopic image quality assessment is an effective way to evaluate the performance of stereoscopic video systems, but how to utilize human visual characteristics effectively is still a research focus in stereoscopic image quality assessment. In this paper, a blind image quality assessment method for stereoscopic images is pro-posed via deep learning. The proposed method is composed of two stages: training and testing. In the training stage, Gabor filter is applied to the left and right distorted images respectively, and natural statistical features un-der different scales and directions are extracted to act as monocular features. Then, left and right images are fused to construct a cyclopean map, and histograms of oriented gradient features are extracted from the cyclopean map to act as binocular features. Finally, a regression model between features and subjective scores is established via deep belief network. In the testing stage, based on the established regression model, left and right image quality scores are predicted and fused to get the final stereoscopic image quality score. Experimental results show that the proposed method is effective for both symmetrical and asymmetrical stereoscopic image databases, and can achieve high consistent alignment with subjective assessment.
出处 《计算机辅助设计与图形学学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第6期968-975,共8页 Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics
基金 国家自然科学基金(61271021)
关键词 立体图像 质量评价 GABOR滤波 独眼图 深度学习 stereoscopic image quality assessment Gabor filtering cyclopean map deep learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Zilly F, Kluger J, Kauff P. Production rules for stereo acquisition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2011, 99(4): 590-606.
  • 2Urey H, Chellappan K V, Erden E, et al. State of the art in stereoscopicand autostereoscoic displays[J]. Proceedings of theIEEE, 2011, 99(4): 540-555.
  • 3刘雪超,吴志勇,黄德天,云海姣.结合自然图像统计和空域变换的无参图像质量评价[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2015,27(2):249-255. 被引量:8
  • 4You J Y, Xing L, Perkis A, et al. Perceptual quality assessmentfor stereoscopic images based on 2D image quality metrics anddisparity analysis[OL]. [2015-06-21]. http://events.engineering.asu.edu/vpqm/vpqm10/Proceedings_VPQM2010/vpqm_p09.pdf.
  • 5Benoit A, Le Callet P, Campisi P, et al. Using disparity forquality assessment of stereoscopic images[C] //Proceedings ofthe 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008: 389-392.
  • 6Bensalma R, Larabi M C. A perceptual metric for stereoscopicimage quality assessment based on the binocular energy[J].Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 24(2):281-316.
  • 7Moorthy A K, Bovik A C. Blind image quality assessment:from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality[J]. IEEETransactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(12): 3350-3364.
  • 8Saad M A, Bovik A C, Charrier C. Blind image quality assessment:a natural scene statistics approach in the DCT domain[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2012, 21(8): 3339-3352.
  • 9Mittal A, Moorthy A K, Bovik A C. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain[J]. IEEE Transactions on ImageProcessing, 2012, 21(12): 4695-4708.
  • 10Hinton G E, Osindero S, Teh Y W. A fast learning algorithm fordeep belief nets[J]. Neural computation, 2006, 18(7): 1527-1554.

二级参考文献30

  • 1Wang Z,Bovik A C,Sheikh H R,et al.Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004,13(4): 600-612.
  • 2Zhang L,Zhang L, Mou X. FSIM:a feature similarity index for image quality assessment[J].IEEE Transactions on Image Processing,2011,20(8):2378-2386.
  • 3Li Q,Wang Z.Reduced-reference image quality assessment using divisive normalization-based image representation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing,2009,3(2): 202-211.
  • 4Parvez Sazzad Z M,Kawayoke Y,Horita Y.No reference image quality assessment for JPEG 2000 based on spatial features[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication,2008,23(4): 257-268.
  • 5Suthaharan S.No reference visually significant blocking artifact metric for natural scene images[J].Journal of Signal Processing, 2009,89(8):1647-1652.
  • 6Zhu X,Milanfar P.A no reference sharpness metric sensitive to blur and noise[C]//International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience. San Diego, CA:IEEE, 2009:64-69.
  • 7Saad M A,Bovik A C,Cormack L. A DCT statistics-based blind image quality index[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters,2010,27(6):583-586.
  • 8Moorth A K, Bovik A C.A two-step framework for constructing blind image quality Indices [J].IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2010, 17(5):513-516.
  • 9Moorth A K,Bovik A C.Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(12): 3350-3364.
  • 10Tang H, Joshi N, Kapoor A. Learning a blind measure of perceptual image quality[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Colorado Springs,USA: IEEE,2011:305-312.

共引文献16

同被引文献81

引证文献19

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部