期刊文献+

两种微螺钉种植体支抗在上颌后牙根间区的稳定性研究 被引量:14

Comparison of Success Rate of Two Kinds of Micro-implant System in Posterior Area
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比两种材质(钛钉和不锈钢钉)微螺钉种植体支抗植入上颌后牙根间区的脱落率,并对各类影响因素进行分析,为医生选择设计提供参考。方法:102例正畸患者平均年龄21岁(13~46岁)。正畸设计强支抗,在上颌后牙根间区共植入172枚微螺钉种植体支抗。研究按照种植体类型(钛钉1.6 mm×8 mm,不锈钢钉1.5mm×8mm)、骨面型(高角和非高角)和年龄(成人和青少年)进行分组。统计分析使用SPSS 13.0软件包。采用卡方检验比较种植体类型、骨面型、年龄对脱落的影响。结果:种植体类型和骨面型对脱落率的影响具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);成年和青少年脱落率的差别无统计学意义。结论:钛钉植入上颌后牙根间区稳定性优于不锈钢钉。高角患者种植体脱落率较高。 Objective:To compare the stability of two kinds of micro-screw system placed in maxillary posterior area.Methods:102patients were selected with 176micro-screws placed.Possible influencing factors including the kinds of micro-screws,age and skeletal patterns were analyzed by Chi-square tests through SPSS Statistical Package.Results:Different kinds of micro-screws and different skeletal patterns exhibited significantly different failure rates(P〈0.05).No significant difference was found between age groups.Conclusion:Higher failure rates were conformed in group of stainless steel micro-screws compared with Ti-alloy micro-screws.The failure rates in high angle cases were higher than those of lower and average angle cases.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期531-533,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 钛钉 不锈钢微螺钉 种植体支抗 Ti-alloy micro-screw Stainless steel micro-screw Anchorage implant
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1朱胜吉,周彦恒,傅民魁,丁鹏.应用种植体支抗正畸治疗的初步临床研究[J].口腔正畸学,2004,11(4):169-173. 被引量:49
  • 2叶德临,张尚慧,张建海,李光碧,杜传诗,赵云凤,魏治统,陈频.人牙本质泊松比的测定[J].生物医学工程学杂志,1995,12(1):10-13. 被引量:3
  • 3Bae SM,Park HS,Kyung HM,et al.Clinical application of micro-implant anchorage.J Clin Orthod,2002,36(5):298-302.
  • 4Ciftci Y,Canay S.The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2000,15(4):571-82.
  • 5Hirnmlova L,Dostalova T,Kacovsky A,et al.Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution:a finite element analysis.J Prosthet Dent,2004,91(1):20-5.
  • 6Cehreli MC,Akca K.Narrow diameter implants as terminal support for occlusal three-unit FPDs:a biomechanical analysis.Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,2004,24(6):513-9.
  • 7Miyawaki S,Koyama I,Inoue M,et al.Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2003,124(4):373-8.
  • 8Migliorati M, Benedicenti S, Signori A, et al. Miniscrew design and bone characteristics: An experimental study of primary stability [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop , 2012, 142(2) : 228- 234.
  • 9Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, et al. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2004, 19(1) : 100-6.
  • 10Cha JY, Kil JK, Yoon TM, et al. Miniscrew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop , 2010, 137(1) : 73-79.

共引文献108

同被引文献134

引证文献14

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部