期刊文献+

尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化对TURBT术后pT1期患者预后的影响 被引量:1

Influence of squamous differentiation on the prognosis of patients with pT1 urothelial carcinoma of bladder after TURBT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化对初次经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)术后p T1期患者预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析初次经TURBT手术、术后病理诊断为T1期的531例膀胱尿路上皮癌患者的临床病理资料。根据患者的术后病理诊断将患者分为2组:A组为尿路上皮癌(单纯型)441例,B组为尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化90例,应用SPSS 20.0统计软件,运用KaplanMeier法分析两种临床病理特点对无复发生存期(RFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响,并用Log-rank检验比较生存曲线;运用COX回归模型单因素和多因素分析膀胱尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化与初次TURBT术后p T1期患者预后之间的关系,评估影响其RFS和PFS的因素。结果:A组单纯尿路上皮癌441例(83.05%),B组尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化90例(16.95%)。B组与A组比较更易具有高级别肿瘤(P<0.001),同时B组较A组有较高的复发率(P=0.018)、较短的无复发生存期(P<0.001)以及较高的进展率(P=0.001)、较短的无进展生存期(P<0.001)。B组与A组比较,年龄(P=0.185)、性别(P=0.135)、吸烟(P=0.728)、肿瘤大小(P=0.436)、肿瘤数目(P=0.112)和膀胱灌注(P=0.054)等差异均无统计学意义。COX多因素生存分析显示:吸烟(HR 1.34,95%CI 1.00-1.79,P=0.048)、鳞状分化的伴发情况(HR 1.43,95%CI 1.02-2.00,P=0.040)以及病理分级(HR 1.51,95%CI 1.13-2.01,P=0.005)等因素显著增加TURBT术后p T1期患者的复发风险;同时,吸烟(HR 1.80,95%CI 1.17-2.76,P=0.008)、鳞状分化的伴发情况(HR 2.07,95%CI 1.32-3.24,P=0.001)以及病理分级(HR 1.90,95%CI 1.24-2.92,P=0.003)等因素显著增加TURBT术后p T1期患者的进展风险。结论:尿路上皮癌伴鳞状分化是TURBT术后p T1期患者的预后独立影响因素,复发率及进展率较高,需密切随访。 Objective: To evaluate squamous differentiation on prognosis in patients with p T1 urothelial carcinoma of bladder(UCB) after first transurethral resection(TURBT). Methods: The retrospective study based on clinicopathologic data was applied to 531 patients of p Tl UCB after first TURBT. The patients were divided into two groups:group A included 441 patients with pure UCB, and group B included 90 patients with squamous differentiation. All the data were calculated by using SPSS 20.0 statistical software(IBM Company, version20.0).Recurrence-free survival(RFS) and progression-free survival(PFS) curves were estimated to study clinicopathologic features of two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference was determined by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to study patient prognosis between patients with squamous differentiation and patients with p T1 UCB through using a Cox proportional hazards regression model, and the factors influencing its RFS and PFS were evaluated. Results: In this study, group A included441 patients with pure UCB, and group B included 90 patients with squamous differentiation. High grade tumors were more common in patients with squamous differentiation than those with pure UCB(P〈0.001). Meanwhile, compared with group A, group B had a higher recurrence rate(P =0.018), shorter RFS(P〈0.001), and the progress of the higher rate(P=0.001), shorter PFS(P〈0.001). Correlations among the age(P=0.185), gender(P=0.135), smoking(P=0.728), tumor size(P=0.436), and tumor count(P=0.112) were not statistically significant. Based on multivariate Cox regression analysis, smoking(HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00-1.79, P =0.048), comorbid conditions of squamous differentiation(HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.00, P =0.040) and pathology classification(HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.13-2.01, P = 0.005) in patients with p T1 urothelial carcinoma of bladder after first TURBT had a higher risk of recurrence; smoking(HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.17-2.76,P =0.008), comorbid conditions of squamous differentiation(HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.32-3.24, P = 0.001) and pathology classification(HR 1.90,95% CI 1.24-2.92, P =0.003) in patients with p T1 urothelial carcinoma of bladder after first TURBT had a higher risk of progress.Conclusion: UCB with squamous differentiation is an independent prognostic predictor, and the presence of squamous differentiation could be associated with higher recurrence/progress rate, and patients with this variant should be followed up closely.
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2016年第3期213-217,共5页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词 膀胱 尿路上皮癌 鳞状分化 TURBT 复发 进展 bladder urothelial carcinoma squamous differentiation TURBT recurrence progression
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Torre L A, Bray F, Siegel R L, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2):87.
  • 2Kurth K H, Denis L, Bouffioux C, et al. Factors affecting recurrence and progression in superficial bladder turnouts[J]. Eur J Cancer,1995, 31A(11):1840.
  • 3Allard P, Bernard P, Fradet Y, et al. The early clinical course of primary Ta and Tl bladder cancer: a proposed prognostic index[J]. BrJ Urol, 1998, 81(5):692.
  • 4Samaratunga H, Delahunt B. Recently described and unusual variants of urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder[J]. Pathology, 2012, 44 (5):407.
  • 5Xylinas E, Rink M, Robinson B D, et al. Impact of histological variants on oncological outcomes of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2013, 49(8): 1889.
  • 6Shah R B, Montgomery J S, Montie J E, et al. Variant (divergent) his tologic differentiation in urothelial carcinoma is under-recognized in community practice: impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large referral hospital[J]. Urol Oncol, 2013, 31(8): 1650.
  • 7Kim S P, Frank I, Cheville J C, et al. The impact of squamous andglandular differentiation on survival after radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma[J]. J Urol, 2012,188(2):405.
  • 8Abd E A, Watts K E, Elson P, et al. The sensitivity of initial transurethral resection or biopsy of bladder tumor (s) for detecting bladder cancer variants on radical cystectomy[J]. J Urol,'2013,189(4): 1263.
  • 9Yang M H, Yen C C, Chen P M, et al. Prognostic-factors-based risk-stratification model for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder in Taiwan[J]. Urology, 2002,59(2):232.
  • 10Lopez-Beltran A, Requena M J, Alvarez-Kindelan J, et al. Squamous differentiation in primary urothelial carcinoma of the urinary tract as seen by MAC387 immunohistochemistry[J]. J Clin Pathol, 2007,60(3):332.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部