论现代与后现代民族志的客观性、主观性与反身性被引量：7

下载PDF

导出

摘要追求更合理的民族志方法论与知识论,是西方人类学界半个世纪以来持续努力的目标,詹姆士·克利福德(James Clifford)于1988年发表《论民志权威》一文,提出既有的各种民族志理论无法摆脱作者个人主观性,主张应倡导一种更为多声与众声喧哗型的新民族志。2014年,北京大学人类学者蔡华教授为文,从客观论立场撰文对克利福德的观点进行批评。然笔者主张,对于当代社会科学而言,对科学的理解不应再框限于实证主义对于客观性的要求,而应包容对不同形态的知识追求。从单声走向多声民族志,展现后现代研究者面对不同形态知识表现出的更大的反身性、包容与谦卑。

作者马腾嶽

出处《思想战线》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第3期7-14,共8页 Thinking

关键词詹姆士·克利福德蔡华客观性主观性反身性

分类号 B5 [哲学宗教—外国哲学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献45

1蔡华.当代民族志方法论——对J.克利福德质疑民族志可行性的质疑[J].民族研究,2014(3):48-63. 被引量：30
2James Clifford, “On ethnographic authority”,in The predicament of culture ; twentieth-century ethnography y literature,and art, Cambridge: Harvard university press, 1988.
3HenrietaMoore, “Anthropology at the turn of the century”,in Anthropological theory today, Cambridge. Polity Press, 1999,p. 8.
4James Clifford,“ On ethnographic authority”,in The predicament of culture : twentieth-century ethnography t literature, and art,Cambridge :Harvard university press, 1988.
5James Clifford, “On ethnographic authority”,in The predicament of culture : twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art, Cambridge :Harvard university press, 1988.
6Jocelyn Linnekin,“ Review”,in Journal of Anthropological Research,2004,vol. 60, no. 4, p. 566.
7James Clifford and Geoie E. Marcus eds. , Writing Culture: the Poetics and Politics of Ethnography t Bericeley : University of California Press, 1986.
8James Clifford,The predicament of culture : twentieth—century ethnography,literature,and art,Cambridge : Harvard university press, 1988.
9.James Clifford, “Introduction: partial truths” , in James Clifford and George E. Marcus eds.,Writing Culture : the Poetics and Politics of Eth-nography ,Berkeley : University of California Press, 1986,pp. 23 - 24.
10James Clifford, “Introduction: partial truths”, in James Clifford and George E. Marcus eds., Writing Culture : the Poetics and Politics of Eth-nography ,Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, pp. 1 -26.

二级参考文献157

1Baba,Marietta L,Carole E.Hill. What' s in the Name ‘ Applied Anthropology' ? An Encounter with Global Practice[A].Washington,DC:American Anthropological Association,2006.1-37.
2Linda G.Basch,Roberta Jill Craven. Transforming academia:challenges and opportunities for an engaged anthropology[M].Arlington,VA:American Anthropological Association,1999.
3James L Peacock. The Future of Anthropology[J].{H}AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST,1997,(01):9-17.
4Marietta L.Baba. The Fifth Subdisciphne:Anthwpological Practice and the Future of Anthropology[J].Human Organiz~ion,1994.174-185.
5John Bennett. Applied and Action Anthropology:Ideological and Conceptual[J].{H}CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY,1996.S24.
6Kirsten Hastrup. Anthropological Advocacy:A Contradiction in Terms?[and Comments][J].{H}CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY,1990,(03):302.
7Barbara Rylko-Bauer,Merrill Singer,John van Willigen. Reclaiming Applied Anthropology:Its Past,Present,and Future[J].{H}AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST,2006,(01):178.
8James L.Peacock. The Future of Anthropology[J].{H}AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST,1997,(01):12.
9Linda Bennett,Shirley Fiske. New Committee on Practicing:Applied and Public Interest Anthropology[J].Anthropology News,2008,(04):24.
10Baba,Marietta L,Carole E.Hill. What' s in the Name ‘ Applied Anthropology' ? An Encounter with Global Practice[A].Washington,DC:American Anthropological Association,2006.24.