硫酸镁干敷与硫酸镁湿敷治疗输液外渗的疗效及优缺点的研究

Research of curative effects and the advantages and disadvantages of magnesium sulfate dry compress and hydropathic compress in the treatment of transfusion extravasation

目的比较硫酸镁干敷与硫酸镁湿敷两种方法治疗输液外渗的治疗效果及并发症情况。方法将102例液体外渗患者随机分为实验组和对照组,各51例。实验组用硫酸镁干敷法敷患处,对照组用50%硫酸镁溶液浸湿纱布覆盖患处。比较两组的治疗效果及并发症情况。结果治疗12 h后,两组治疗效果比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组并发症发生例数少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论使用硫酸镁干敷法治疗输液外渗疗效与硫酸镁湿敷法相当,发生并发症明显少于硫酸镁湿敷法,值得推广。

Objective To compare curative effects and complications between magnesium sulfate dry compress and hydropathic compress in the treatment of transfusion extravasation. Methods A total of 102 patients with transfusion extravasation were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 51 cases in each group. The experimental group received magnesium sulfate dry compress, and the control group received hydropathic compress by 50% magnesium sulfate solution. Curative effects and complications were compared between the two groups. Results After 12 h of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference of curative effects between the two groups（P〈0.05）. The experimental group had less cases with complications than the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Implement of magnesium sulfate dry compress provides similar curative effect as hydropathic compress in treating transfusion extravasation, while its complications are much less than those of hydropathic compress. This method is worth promoting.