期刊文献+

高官落马遏制腐败了吗?——来自震慑效应的解释 被引量:25

原文传递
导出
摘要 遏制腐败是一个国家的政府有效运作的重要条件,是当前中国由中等收入国家迈向高收入国家的重要支撑。本文基于1998—2011年的省区面板数据实证发现,高官落马显著地抑制了地区腐败程度。这种效应是显著的,在考虑了时间滞后性、地方常规反腐力度等方面的干扰因素之后,仍然具有稳健性。进一步的机制分析表明,高官落马形成了一种震慑效应,从而使得地方官员减少了腐败与违纪活动。这种震慑效应具有地理邻近的空间外溢性,而其发挥又具有条件性,以一定程度的经济和政治联系为基础。本文的发现对于理解官员行为与反腐败建设具有启示意义。
出处 《世界经济文汇》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第2期1-23,共23页 World Economic Papers
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(7137329071303063) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(15JNQM029)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1Acemoglu, D., S Johnson and J. A. Robinson, 2005, "Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth, Chapter6 in Handbook of Economic Growth, la, Eds. by P. Aghion and S. Durlanf, North-Holland Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • 2Ades, A. and R. DiTella, 1999, "Rents, Competition, and Corruption," American Economic Review, 89 (4) :982-993.
  • 3Ahrend, R., 2002, "Press Freedom, Human Capital, and Corruption," DELTA Working Paper, No. 2002-11.
  • 4Aidt, T. S., 2003, "Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey,' The Economic Journal, 113(491) :F632-F652.
  • 5Attila, J., 2008, "Is Corruption Contagious? An Econometric Analysis," UNPI Working Paper, No. 742.
  • 6Besley, T. and R. Burgess, 2002, "The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (4) : 1415-1451.
  • 7Brunetti, A. and W. Beatrice, 2003, "A Free Press is Bad News for Corruption," Journal of Public Economics, 87 ( 7-8 ) : 1801-1824.
  • 8Carvajal, R., 1999, "Large-scale Corruption: Definition, Causes, and Cures," Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12 (4) :335-353.
  • 9Demsetz, H., 1967, "Towards a Theory of Property Rights, 'r American Economic Review, 57 ( 2 ) :61-70.
  • 10Dineer, O. and B. Gunalp, 2008, , Corruption, Income Inequality, and Poverty in the United States," FEEM Working Pa- per, No. 54.

二级参考文献411

共引文献1049

同被引文献311

引证文献25

二级引证文献347

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部