期刊文献+

法律确定性的统合理性根据与法治实施 被引量:6

The Unified-Reason Ground of Legal Certainty and the Implement of Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法治是理性事业,法律确定性是法律理性的最重要表征。确立法律确定性的理性根据,抵御法律怀疑主义,对法治具有重大的理论和现实意义。法律确定性存在形式、实质、程序、生存四个维度。基于人类理解世界的视域分化,理性分别在本体、认知、实践上具有与同一世界三重关系对应的三重核心意义,即作为逻各斯的理性与主体内在关系对应,合理性与主客关系对应,合理与主体间关系对应。分立来看,法律确定性四维度对理性三重核心意义有所侧重。然而,欲全面、深刻理解包括法律现象在内的世界现象,理论家当有以统合视域关照世界之权限,法理论家亦可根据统合理性理解法律确定性。其中,"内嵌统合"使得统合理性具有辩证内涵,这不仅令以统合理性为根据的法律确定性理论能有效回应法律怀疑主义的挑战,而且当以统合理性阐发法治实施时,法治实施亦相应蕴含"和而不同"的科学意义、文化意义和生存意义。 The rule of law is an enterprise of reason, and legal certainty is the most important representation of the legal reason. Establishing the reason-ground of legal certainty to resist legal skepticism is of great theoretical and practical significance for the rule of law. There are four dimensions of legal certainty, namely, formal, substantial, procedural and existential one. Because of horizon differentiation occurred in the understand of the world, respectively, reason has triple focal meaning in ontology, cognition, practice, which are corresponding to triple relation of The-One-World, that is to say, reason as logos is corresponding to inner-subjective relations, rationality is corresponding to subject-object relations, reasonableness is corresponding to inter-subjective relations. Separately, the four dimensions of legal certainty place particular emphasis on triple focal meaning of reason. However, if theorists would like to have a comprehensive and deep understanding of world phenomenon including legal ones, then, they should have the right to inspect the world in unified horizon, and legal theorists could understand legal certainty in according with unified-reason as well. Among others, "embedded unification" makes unified-reason qualified for dialectical connotations, which not only makes the theory of legal certainty on basis of unified-reason can respond to the challenge of legal skepticism effectively, but also, when the implementation of law is elucidated with unified-reason, correspondingly, it also implies scientific, cultural, existential meaning in harmony without uniformity.
作者 陈曦
机构地区 深圳大学法学院
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第6期105-118,共14页 Journal of Social Sciences
关键词 法律确定性 统合理性 法治实施 Legal Certainty the Unified-reason the Implement of Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1R. Siltala, Law, Truth and Reason, Dordrecht and New York: Springer, 2011, p. 224.
  • 2R. Posner, "The Jurisprudence of Skepticism", Michigan Law Review, Vol. 86, 1988, pp. 827-891.
  • 3See A. Peezenik, On Law and Reason, Dordrecht : Springer, 2008, p. 24.
  • 4J. Hutcheson, "The Judgment Intuitive: The Function of the ' Hunch' in Judicial Decision", Cornell Law Quarterly, Vol. 14, 1929, pp. 274-288. .
  • 5I. Frank, Law and Modern Mind, New York: Anchor Books, 1963, p. 50, p. 113.
  • 6R. M. Unger, What Should Legal Analysis Become? London and New York: Verso, 1996, p. 114.
  • 7F. A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, London: Routledge, 1960, p. 208.
  • 8B. Stroud, The Significance of Philosophical Skepticism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984, p. 4.
  • 9K. Llewellyn, The Bramble Bush, New York: Oceana, 1930, p. 3.
  • 10W. Cook, "Scientific Method and the Law", A. B.A. Journal, Vol. 13, 1927, pp. 303-309.

二级参考文献33

  • 1杨军.官民矛盾步入显化期[J].决策探索,2009(1):36-37. 被引量:3
  • 2李龙,汪习根.宪政规律论[J].中国法学,1999(4):33-46. 被引量:48
  • 3乔治F.麦克林,邹诗鹏.多元文化社会中的宽容精神[J].求是学刊,2005,32(1):6-10. 被引量:20
  • 4邵建东.从形式法治到实质法治——德国“法治国家”的经验教训及启示[J].南京大学法律评论,2004(22):162-168. 被引量:34
  • 5[法]米歇尔·福柯.《话语的秩序》,转引自许宝强、袁伟选编.《语言与翻译的政治》,中央编译出版社2001年版,第1页.
  • 6崔卫平:《我们的尊严在于拥有价值理想》,《南方周末》2007年1月22日.
  • 7王旭.《"回应型司法"更能粘合民心》,《人民日报》2013年9月27日,第5版.
  • 8郭湛.《正确认识人的主体性》,载《光明日报》2001年4月10日.
  • 9习近平在十八届中央纪委二次全会上发表的重要讲话.参见2013年1月22日,新华网,http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2013-01/22/c_114461056.htm.
  • 10白靖利、侯文坤.《不问苍生问“鬼神”--官场“风水”现象扫描》,载《人民日报》2013年8月10日,第4版.

共引文献134

同被引文献84

引证文献6

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部