摘要
中药中有害物质痕量残留分析不同于常规的常量或微量分析,对于分析技术要求较高。进一步规范该类分析工作,做好实验室质量控制,是保证分析结果的准确与可靠的重要前提。本文以最新版美国药典(USP37-NF32)通则<1224><1225>和<1226>为基础,介绍了分析方法转移、验证和认证的内容,讨论了三者之前的联系与区别,重点探讨了对于中药痕量分析的参考意义及技术要求。
Traditional Chinese medicine trace analysis is different from either conventional constant or trace analysis, which requires much higher analysis technology, and the well quality control of laboratory are important prerequisties for the accuracy and reliability of analysis results,which isimportant prerequisites for the quality control of laboratory. This article focused on the General Chapter〈1224〉〈1225〉〈1226〉 of the latest version of U. S. Pharmacopoeia 37/National Formulary ( USP37-NF32 ) and introduced the technical requirements of "transfer of analytical procedures" , "validation of compendial procedures" and "verification of compendia] procedures". In addition, the article further discussed the interconneetions and differences among the three analytical methods, and mainly explored their reference significance and technical requirements on trace analysis of traditional Chinese medicines.
出处
《药物分析杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2016年第5期868-872,共5页
Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
基金
国家十二五"重大新药创制"课题"中药质量安全检测和风险控制技术平台"(2014ZX09304307-002)
关键词
实验室质量控制
转移
验证
确认
中药
痕量分析
外源性有害残留检测
laboratory quality control
transfer
validation
verification
trace analysis
traditional Chinese medicines
detection of extrinsic harmful residues