期刊文献+

美国药典新通则<1224><1225><1226>分析方法转移、验证和确认及其在中药痕量分析质量保证体系中的作用 被引量:6

Transfer,validation and verification of analytical procedures described in General chapter<1224><1225><1226> of U.S.Pharmacopoeia(USP37-NF 32)and their significances for trace analysis assurance system of traditional Chinese medicines
原文传递
导出
摘要 中药中有害物质痕量残留分析不同于常规的常量或微量分析,对于分析技术要求较高。进一步规范该类分析工作,做好实验室质量控制,是保证分析结果的准确与可靠的重要前提。本文以最新版美国药典(USP37-NF32)通则<1224><1225>和<1226>为基础,介绍了分析方法转移、验证和认证的内容,讨论了三者之前的联系与区别,重点探讨了对于中药痕量分析的参考意义及技术要求。 Traditional Chinese medicine trace analysis is different from either conventional constant or trace analysis, which requires much higher analysis technology, and the well quality control of laboratory are important prerequisties for the accuracy and reliability of analysis results,which isimportant prerequisites for the quality control of laboratory. This article focused on the General Chapter〈1224〉〈1225〉〈1226〉 of the latest version of U. S. Pharmacopoeia 37/National Formulary ( USP37-NF32 ) and introduced the technical requirements of "transfer of analytical procedures" , "validation of compendial procedures" and "verification of compendia] procedures". In addition, the article further discussed the interconneetions and differences among the three analytical methods, and mainly explored their reference significance and technical requirements on trace analysis of traditional Chinese medicines.
出处 《药物分析杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期868-872,共5页 Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis
基金 国家十二五"重大新药创制"课题"中药质量安全检测和风险控制技术平台"(2014ZX09304307-002)
关键词 实验室质量控制 转移 验证 确认 中药 痕量分析 外源性有害残留检测 laboratory quality control transfer validation verification trace analysis traditional Chinese medicines detection of extrinsic harmful residues
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献55

共引文献64

同被引文献61

引证文献6

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部