期刊文献+

基于RS-SVM模型的滑坡易发性评价因子选择方法研究 被引量:19

Research on the Method to Select Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation Factors Based on RS-SVM Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为提高滑坡易发性评价的精度和准确性,利用粗糙集理论和支持向量机模型进行滑坡易发性评价因子选择。以三峡库区秭归到巴东段为研究区,首先通过相关分析和主成分变换对初始滑坡评价因子进行筛减与合并,将剩余的评价因子分为控制因素和影响因素,采用粗糙集理论分别对其进行属性约简,生成核因子集。然后,利用核因子集对支持向量机模型进行训练和预测,得到滑坡易发性评价结果,其预测精度和曲线下面积分别为76.9%和0.939。最后,将两种传统的对所有滑坡评价因子一同进行筛选的方法用于该研究区的滑坡易发性评价,并将传统方法与该方法的评价结果进行比较,结果表明,该文所提出的滑坡评价因子选择方法的精度和准确性均优于传统方法。 The evaluation of regional landslide susceptibility is very important for the medium and long-term prediction and forecast of the landslide hazard.Whether the evaluation results are in line with the actual situation depends on the scientific and reasonable determination of evaluation factors.In order to improve the precision and accuracy of evaluation result,this paper proposed a method to select evaluation factors of landslide susceptibility based on Rough Set theory(RS)and Support Vector Machine model(SVM).Zigui to Badong section in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area is used as a study area.Firstly,the original evaluation factors obtained from remote sensing image and digital elevation model are screened and combined by correlation analysis and Principal Components Analysis(PCA).The remaining evaluation factors were divided into control factors and influence factors,and attribute reduction is carried out on the control factors and the influencing factors by RS respectively to generate core factor set.Then,SVM model is used to train and predict the core factor set selected to get the results of the regional landslide susceptibility evaluation,the precision and accuracy of which are 76.9% and 0.939 respectively.In order to make a comparison between the proposed method to select valuation factor and those traditional ones which screen all environmental factors at the same time,the existing two traditional methods are also used for the landslide susceptibility evaluation in this study area,and the precision and accuracy of which are 53.6%,0.912 and 72.8%,0.932 respectively.The results show that the proposed method to select landslide susceptibility evaluation factors in this paper is better than the traditional methods.
出处 《地理与地理信息科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第3期23-28,2,共6页 Geography and Geo-Information Science
基金 国家863项目"重大工程地质灾害快速监测与评估"(2012AA121303)
关键词 滑坡易发性评价 评价因子筛选 粗糙集理论 支持向量机 landslide susceptibility evaluation evaluation factor selection rough set theory support vector machine
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1陈剑,杨志法,刘衡秋.滑坡的易滑度分区及其概率预报模式[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(13):2392-2396. 被引量:29
  • 2戴福初,李军.暴雨滑坡泥石流的研究进展与趋向[J].地理研究,1998,17(增):117-124.
  • 3牛瑞卿,彭令,叶润青,武雪玲.基于粗糙集的支持向量机滑坡易发性评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(2):430-439. 被引量:56
  • 4LEE S,RYU J H,MIN K,et al.Landslide susceptibility analysis using GIS and artificial neural network[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,2003,28:1361-1376.
  • 5LEE S,MIN K.Statistical analysis of landslide susceptibility at Yongin,Korea[J].Environmental Geology,2001,40:1095-1113.
  • 6DAI F C,LEE C F.Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS Lantau Island,Hong Kong[J].Geomorphology,2002,42:213-238.
  • 7OHLMACHER C G,DAVIS C J.Using multiple regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas,USA[J].Engineering Geology,2003,69:331-343.
  • 8AYALEW L,YAMAGISHI H.The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the KakudaYahiko Mountains,Central Japan[J].Geomorphology,2005,65:15-31.
  • 9YAO X,THAM L,DA F C.Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine:A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong,China[J].Geomorphology,2008,101(4):572-582.
  • 10MARJANOVI M,KOVA EVI M,BAJAT B,et al.Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm[J].Engineering Geology,2011,123(3):225-234.

二级参考文献46

  • 1杨志法,陈剑.关于滑坡预测预报方法的思考[J].工程地质学报,2004,12(2):118-123. 被引量:42
  • 2黄润秋,向喜琼,巨能攀.我国区域地质灾害评价的现状及问题[J].地质通报,2004,23(11):1078-1082. 被引量:116
  • 3李雪平,唐辉明.基于GIS的分组数据Logistic模型在斜坡稳定性评价中的应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005,35(3):361-365. 被引量:24
  • 4朱阿兴,裴韬,乔建平,陈永波,周成虎,蔡强国.基于专家知识的滑坡危险性模糊评估方法[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(4):1-12. 被引量:24
  • 5谭万沛 王成华.暴雨泥石流滑坡的区域预测与预报[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1994..
  • 6David K K, Raymond C W, Robert K M, et al. Real-time landslide warning during heavy rainfall[J]. Science, 1987, 238:921 - 925.
  • 7Dai F C, Lee C F. Frequency-volume relation and prediction of rainfall-induced landslides[J]. Engineering Geology, 2001, 59:253 - 266.
  • 8Aleotti P, Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: Summary review and new perspectives[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and Environment, 1999, 58 : 21 - 44.
  • 9van Westen C J,van Asch T W J,Soeters R. Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult? [J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and Environment, 2006,65 : 167-184.
  • 10Komac M. A landslide susceptibility model using the analytical hierarchy process method and multivariate statistics in Perialpine Slovenia[J]. Geomorphology, 2006, 74: 17-28.

共引文献88

同被引文献240

引证文献19

二级引证文献271

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部