“华亭血脉,金针微度,在此而已”考释——明末清初“画学道统”衍化及其思想、政治隐喻

Analysis of the Inscriptive Writings “Both the Inheritor of Huating School and the Slowly Spread of Good Tradition are Just in There”of Wang Yuanqi——Derivation and Political Metaphor of the Painting Philosophy Orthodoxy in the Late Ming and Early Qing

通过对明末清初"画学道统"衍化及形成原因的较详细梳理,认为,前此关于董其昌至王时敏、王原祁"画学道统"之"直贯型"重要命题是不符合画史实情的,实则由于王时敏在明清易祚语境下的"明修栈道,暗度陈仓",导致董其昌与王时敏之间"画学道统"之"断裂",直至王原祁才真正接续上董其昌血脉,明末清初"画学道统"应为与时代思想、政治文化衍化合拍之断裂后重建,或可谓之"转折型",而明清易祚中思想、政治巨变又是其出现的主要原因。王原祁所说"华亭血脉""金针微渡"微言之大义"在此而已"。

From the deeply analysis the derivation of the painting philosophy orthodoxy in the late Ming and early Qing dynasty,it is not the reality of history that both Wang Shimin and Wang Yuanqi are the inheritors of the painting philosophy orthodoxy of Dong Qichang. The fact is that Wang Yuanqi is the real inheritor of Dong qichang＇s painting school whose name is Huating School,whereas Wang Shimin is not,as his ideas have a lot of inconsistencies with Dong Qichang who he had pretend to advance along one path of painting while secretly going along another in the alternation of dynasties. All in all,the painting philosophy orthodoxy had changed with the alternation of dynasties in the late Ming and early Qing dynasty,and it had resulted the change of ideological and cultural thoughts. These kinds of changes are the real reasons why Wang Yuanqi had wrote＂both the inheritor of Huating School and the slowly spread of good tradition are just in there＂in his inscriptive writings.