期刊文献+

转录组分析揭示玉米大斑病菌对解淀粉芽孢杆菌胁迫响应机制 被引量:6

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Setosphaeria turcica Revealed its Responses Mechanisms to the Biological Control Agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
原文传递
导出
摘要 在植物病害生物防治系统中,生防微生物的生物防治机制是关注的重点,而植物病原物如何响应并抵抗或缓解生防微生物胁迫的机制往往被忽略.本文以解淀粉芽孢杆菌(Bacillus amyloliquefaciens)和玉米大斑病菌(Setosphaeria turcica)为生防互作系统,利用RNA-seq技术研究S.turcica对B.amyloliquefaciens生防胁迫响应的分子机制,结果表明,与对照S.turcica样品比较,B.amyloliquefaciens发酵液处理的S.turcica样品中共有393个基因显著差异表达,其中168个基因上调表达,225个基因下调表达.已知解淀粉芽孢杆菌的抗菌物质一般作用于真菌细胞壁、细胞膜,通过破坏细胞壁及细胞膜的结构抑制真菌生长,因此,本研究在差异表达基因中重点分析S.turcica细胞壁、细胞膜结构相关基因,发现S.turcica上调表达细胞壁组分蛋白(1-6)-beta-D葡聚糖生物合成途径基因、麦角固醇合成途径Delta(14)甾醇还原酶基因、脂肪酸合成酶基因、抗氧化相关的抗坏血酸过氧化物酶基因、谷胱甘肽硫转移酶基因、腺苷三磷酸结合盒转运蛋白基因;下调表达调控细胞凋亡的Metacaspase基因.这说明S.turcica通过调节芽孢杆菌抗菌活性物质的靶标蛋白或合成途径的基因表达,以缓解B.amyloliquefaciens的生防胁迫作用,是一种涉及多个基因和多个信号途径共同参与调控的复杂网络.该研究结果将为研究病原真菌对生防微生物胁迫的抗性机制奠定基础. The mechanisms of biological control of plant diseases have been intensively studied; however, how plant pathogens respond to and resist or alleviate biocontrol agents remain largely unknown. In the present study, comparative transcriptome analysis was performed to elucidate how the northern corn leaf blight pathogen, Setosphaeria turcica, responds to and resists the biocontrol agent, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. The results showed that, compared with the control sample of S. turcica, a total of 393 genes were differentially expressed in the sample of S. turcica that was treated with B. amyloliquefaciens fermentation broth. Among these genes, 168 were up-regulated and 225 were down-regulated. Further analysis indicates that various genes related to the fungal cell wall were significantly up-regulated, including(1-6)-beta-D glucan biosynthetic pathway genes, delta(14)-sterol reductase ergosterol biosynthesis pathway genes, fatty acid synthase genes, L-ascorbate peroxidase genes related to oxidative stress, glutathione S-transferase genes, and ABC transporter genes. In contrast, metacaspase genes that regulate apoptosis were significantly down-regulated. These results suggested that S. turcica recruit numerous genes to respond to or resist the biocontrol of B. amyloliquefaciens. The present study provides a valuable resource on the mechanisms of fungal pathogen resistance to biocontrol agents.
出处 《中国科学:生命科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2016年第5期627-636,共10页 Scientia Sinica(Vitae)
基金 植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室开放课题(批准号:SKLOF201508)资助
关键词 玉米大斑病菌 解淀粉芽孢杆菌 转录组分析 生物防治 Setosphaeria turcica Bacillus amyloliquefaciens transcriptome analysis biological control
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Kontoyiannis D P, Lewis R E. Antifungal drug resistance of pathogenic fungi. Lancet, 2002, 9312:1135-1144.
  • 2Finking R, Marahiel M A. Biosynthesis of nonribosomal peptides 1. Annu Rev Microbiol, 2004, 58:453-488.
  • 3Idris E E, Bocbow H, Ross H, et al. Use of Bacillus Subtilis as hiocontrol agent. Vi. phytohormonelike action of culture filtrates prepared from plant growth-promoting Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Fzb24, Fzb42, Fzb45 and Bacillus Subtilis Fzb37. J Plant Dis Protect, 2004, 6: 583-597.
  • 4Idriss E E, Makarewicz O, Farouk A, et al. Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens Fzb45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect. Microbiology, 2002, 7:2097-2109.
  • 5Lisboa M P, Bonatto D, Bizani D, et al. Characterization of a bacteriocin-like substance produced by Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens isolated from the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Int Microbiol, 2010, 2:111-118.
  • 6Nihorimbere V, Cawoy H, Seyer A, et al. Impact of rhizosphere factors on cyclic lipopeptide signature from the plant beneficial strain Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens S499. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2012, 1:176-191.
  • 7Heerklotz H, Seelig J. Leakage and lysis of lipid membranes induced by the lipopeptide surfactin. Eur Biophys J, 2007, 4-5:305 -314.
  • 8Bonmatin J-M, Lapr6vote O, Peypoux F. Diversity among microbial cyclic lipopeptides: iturins and surfactins. Activity-structure relationships to design new bioactive agents. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen, 2003, 6:541-556.
  • 9Deleu M, Paquot M, and Nylander T. Fengycin interaction with lipid monolayers at the air-aqueous interface-implications for the effect of fengycin on biological membranes. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2005, 2:358-365.
  • 10王梅娟,李坡,吴敏,范永山,谷守芹,董金皋.玉米大斑病菌ATMT突变体库的构建及其分析[J].中国农业科学,2012,45(12):2384-2392. 被引量:15

二级参考文献22

  • 1张震,杜新法,柴荣耀,毛雪琴,邱海萍,王艳丽,王教瑜,孙国昌.根癌农杆菌介导遗传转化稻曲病菌[J].中国水稻科学,2006,20(4):440-442. 被引量:20
  • 2方丽,刘海青,宋凤鸣,郑重.农杆菌介导的黄瓜炭疽菌遗传转化[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,32(4):360-366. 被引量:17
  • 3王玉萍,王晓鸣,马青.我国玉米大斑病菌生理小种组成变异研究[J].玉米科学,2007,15(2):123-126. 被引量:43
  • 4Dong J G, Fan Y S, Gui X M, An X L, Ma J F, Dong Z E Geographic distribution and genetic analysis of physiological races of Setosphaeria turcica in northern China. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 2008, 3( 1): 389-398.
  • 5Perkins J M, Pedersen W L. Disease development and yield losses associated with leaf northern blight on corn. Plant Disease, 1987, 71 (10): 940-943.
  • 6Rho H S, Kang S, Lee Y H. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the plant pathogenic fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Molecules and Cells, 2001, 12(3): 407-411.
  • 7Mullins E D, Kang S. Transformation: a tool for studying fungal pathogens of plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2001, 58(14): 2043-2052.
  • 8Michielse C B, Hooykaas P J J, Horidel C A M J J, Ram A F J. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi. Current Genetics, 2005, 48:1-17.
  • 9Bundock P, den Dulk-Ras A, Beijersbergen A, Hooykaas P J J. Trans-kingdom T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaeiens to Saccharomyees cerevisiae. The EMBO Journal, 1995, 14(13): 3206-3214.
  • 10de Groot M J A, Bundock P, Hooykass P J J, Beijersbergen A G M. Agrobacterium tumefaeiens mediated transformation of filamentous fungi. Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16: 839-842.

共引文献14

同被引文献118

引证文献6

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部